This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Theironminer (talk | contribs) at 04:13, 16 June 2014. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 04:13, 16 June 2014 by Theironminer (talk | contribs)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Theironminer, you are invited to the Teahouse
Hi Theironminer! Thanks for contributing to Misplaced Pages. |
QoS
1. See WP:BRD and stop edit warring on the QoS article: use the talk page if you want to reach a consensus. 2. "Mixed" covers everything: positive, negative and, well, mixed. It's utterly pointless and stupid to put mixed and positive: it covers the same points. This has been discussed numerous times in various places and at the film project, so if you want to change the consensus, you have to try and reach consensus through DISCUSSION, not brainlessly edit warring. - SchroCat (talk) 19:03, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
I consider your choice of words, saying I "brainlessly" edit the article. According to rotten tomatoes, any movie with 57%-69% means mixed-TO-positive reviews, meaning reviews were originally mixed and later became more positive. The consensus on the site called the film, positively, "an impressive entry to the Bond canon." I suggest you leave the article with the mixed-to-positive statement and not make a big deal about it. Just move on. - theironminer (talk). 12:10 AM, 16 June, 2014 (UTC)