Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license.
Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat.
We can research this topic together.
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Jakec (talk | contribs) at 20:41, 23 July 2014 (what's the point of holding this back?). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
@The Almightey Drill: New enough and long enough, meets core content policies mostly. Honors section is unreferenced. AGF Spanish sources. --Jakob (talk) 23:28, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
OK, good. --Jakob (talk) 01:40, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
The QPQ review is incomplete. Yoninah (talk) 16:45, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
No, it isn't. It's just been disputed; that's different. --Jakob (talk) 17:25, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
Sorry, "Interesting hook with a source. Valid date." is not a valid DYK review. Yoninah (talk) 19:00, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
What's the point of going so far as to demand this? There's no proof everything wasn't checked, just like there's no proof everything was checked if somebody writes a thousand words explaining how they checked and spotchecked everything. --Jakob (talk) 20:41, 23 July 2014 (UTC)