Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by AcidSnow (talk | contribs) at 20:22, 15 August 2014 (→POV: r). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Africa: Central African Republic Start‑class Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica Start This article has been rated as Start-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Central African Republic.

Military history: African Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history Start This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale. This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: | b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> | b2<!--Coverage and accuracy   --> = <yes/no> | b3<!--Structure               --> = <yes/no> | b4<!--Grammar and style       --> = <yes/no> | b5<!--Supporting materials    --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion. Associated task forces: /  African military history task force

POV

Given that the Seleka persecuted non-Muslims with anti-apostasy laws, one needs to be unbiased in assessing the nature of the situation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Astrohoundy (talk • contribs) 15:54, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

It would still be orginal research which is not accepted here. AcidSnow (talk) 08:27, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

The fact that Djotodia's declaration of Sharia Law to the government of Saudi Arabia threatened the executions of millions of Christians for apostasy is not original research or point of view. It is well-established from cited sources that apostasy-trials are an integral part of Sharia Law. Either cite evidence to refute the evidence cited here, or risk being blocked.Astrohoundy (talk) 19:20, 15 August 2014 (UTC)

"not original research", you must be joking since Misplaced Pages is not research. I will give you one more warning before I report you for your disruptive edits and your original research. Anyways, I doubt I will be blocked for doing nothing wrong. AcidSnow (talk) 20:22, 15 August 2014 (UTC)

• Start-Class Africa articles
• Low-importance Africa articles
• Start-Class Central African Republic articles
• Unknown-importance Central African Republic articles
• WikiProject Central African Republic articles
• WikiProject Africa articles
• Start-Class military history articles
• Start-Class African military history articles
• African military history task force articles