This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Llywrch (talk | contribs) at 05:17, 25 August 2014 (thanx). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 05:17, 25 August 2014 by Llywrch (talk | contribs) (thanx)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)How to disable Media Viewer:
- At the top of your page when you are logged in: Preferences > Appearance > Files.
Subpages:
- User:Neotarf/Signpost Arbitration Reports 2013 Index of my arb reports, a regular feature I wrote covering the Arbitration Committee for the Signpost during the 2013 arbitration cycle
- User:Neotarf/Arbitration Committee Elections 2013: Neotarf's picks:Slate for 2013 ArbCom elections
- User:Neotarf/EditCounterOptIn.js: Enables edit counter
- User talk:Neotarf/ArbCom 2013:List of Arbcom cases and requests for 2013
- User talk:Neotarf/Arbitration enforcement:Some notes
- User talk:Neotarf/Other stuff (including link to discussion about "retired" banner)
- User talk:Neotarf/Jimbo civility speech transcript Wikimania civility speech, August 2014
Kumioko
I applaud your efforts to help a fellow editor. Though I might not agree with you on process, the sentiment is nice. Jehochman 01:48, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
- I neither help nor hinder. It is an opportunity for the community to resolve an ongoing issue and put it to rest; it is an opportunity for Kumioko to have a sizable number of people give him feedback about his actions. My philosophy about a ban appeal was expressed here, when the ban was first enacted. The rest will be up to the community, and Kumioko. —Neotarf (talk) 02:32, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for the alert
But I was out of town for the weekend. By the time I got your message, the discussion seems to have come to a resolution. Thanks. (PS: You appear to be as retired as I am semi-retired.;-) -- llywrch (talk) 05:17, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
Media Viewer RfC arbitration case - motion to suspend case
You are receiving this message as you have either commented on a case page or are named as a party to the case. A motion has been proposed to suspend the Media Viewer RfC arbitration case for a maximum of 60 days due to recent developments. If you wish to comment regarding the motion there is a section on the proposed decision talk page for this. For the Arbitration Committee, Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs). Message delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 02:33, 25 August 2014 (UTC)