Misplaced Pages

User talk:AmritasyaPutra

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Vanamonde93 (talk | contribs) at 21:25, 11 September 2014 (Section, sign). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 21:25, 11 September 2014 by Vanamonde93 (talk | contribs) (Section, sign)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Archives (Index)

ABISY

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Akhil Bharatiya Itihas Sankalan Yojana. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring states:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
Giving you the chance to self-revert, as you have hit 4, but don't assume I won't report you. Vanamonde93 (talk) 10:33, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

For the records. Vanamonde93 reverted me 5 times within 1h, and pastes this warning after my 4th revert and takes it to ANI in next 2 mins. --AmritasyaPutra✍ 16:22, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Information icon Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring. The thread is Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:AmritasyaPutra reported by User:Vanamonde93 (Result: ). Thank you. Vanamonde93 (talk) 10:39, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

For the records: closed with no action and this remark about Vanamonde93 by the closing admin: "Please avoid making personal comments on the talk page. "Are you deliberately being dense" should be avoided. Anyone can ask a question at WP:RS/N if you want an opinion on the usability of a source." The second referring to his dramatic outrage in RS/N when he found that I have put a request there about Organiser. --AmritasyaPutra✍ 15:30, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

On Criticism of Sikhism

I don't see how my edits regarding the Adi Granth were undue or negative toned. I merely quoted in some more detail that gave a better description of the textual criticism. This is actually a section that could be expanded much more, since every other religious text seems to have extensive criticism. Besides, the person criticising is one of the most important polemical authors against Sikhism, so giving him more weight is not undue in my opinion. So, before my edit the textual section only criticised the general content; however, i added the criticism of the grammar & related criticism on Sikh views on Islam. I don't see how that isn't deserving of inclusion.58.106.237.48 (talk) 10:11, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

Re:Edit on Hindutva page

Thank you for the update and the edit. DebashisM 13:41, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

Notification of Arbitration request

You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Praveen Togadia dispute and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the following resources may be of use—

Thanks, Kautilya3 (talk) 15:59, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

No wish. --AmritasyaPutra✍ 16:03, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

Case request declined

The arbitration committee declined the request for a case involving the Praveen Togadia dispute, concluding that other dispute resolution processes should be attempted first. The arbitrators comments here may be helpful. For the arbitration committee, --S Philbrick(Talk) 21:59, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thank you very much for the barnstar! I'm really happy that my interference is appreciated. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 05:03, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

ANI

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Vanamonde93 (talk) 21:25, 11 September 2014 (UTC)