Misplaced Pages

User talk:FFA P-16

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by DPL bot (talk | contribs) at 09:17, 7 October 2014 (dablink notification message (see the FAQ)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 09:17, 7 October 2014 by DPL bot (talk | contribs) (dablink notification message (see the FAQ))(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Welcome

File:Verifiability and Neutral point of view (Common Craft)-600px-en.ogv
A video showing the basics of verifiability and neutral point of view policies.

Welcome!

Hello, FFA P-16, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like Misplaced Pages and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!  - Ahunt (talk) 16:44, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

Swiss Air Force

Merging articles does not mean copying the old article into the new article. I have all the promo, non-relevant and unsourced info removed. The Banner talk 03:48, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

Merging also don't mean that most of the informations get lost. It is not promo it is history and facts about this teams, al references is given in the section for references and external links. Also your "correction" to the PC-7 Team is wrong. And the comment about the aircraft of the Hornet display is laking specific of the uesd aircrat's. If ther is not a own pace about this Teams ( in this case as result from a vote) it should contain here more than 2-4 sentens. Please don't see this as personal attack, just as a request,.. It looks like you don't know much about the swiss air force,so please be careful with deleting informations. It looks like we have not the same opinien about this. My suggestion is to have now the full text and others like MilborneOne and Ahunt cane go trough it.(I know they will delet some things out). FFA P-16 (talk) 04:46, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

I have asked MilborneOne and Ahunt to have a look at it, I think they will delet some things out, and if they will delet everything you had deleted out.. well then are you 3 vers me and then I will accept this. ~I hope you agree with this Bye FFA P-16 (talk) 05:05, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

You are trying to give the whole team undue weight by adding irrelevant info. It was not for nothing that the AfD-result was merge and not keep. You are making a whole bunch of promo of it, and on top of it you are edit warring. The Banner talk 06:23, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
And indeed, I do not know to much about the Swiss Air Force. But I do know you have a distinguished career of blowing things way out of proportion and that you try to make it far more important than it really is. And the fact that you have used sockpuppets (here and on the Dutch Misplaced Pages) to protect your stuff, is, in my personal opinion, rather deadly for your reliability and the articles you produce. The Banner talk 06:28, 5 October

2014 (UTC)

No I don't make any promo for them, I only add the Informations about them in, they don't need any promo all this teams have more request for displays as they do, and they do the displays for free, so its wrong to say i made promo for them. This teams are may not important for you but we talking right now about the wikipeda page about the swiss air Force and all this teams are an important part of the swiss air force.I don't made things more important as they are, i have shown you all the refrences already in the past, and if you don't know much about the swiss air force how can you say i am making things more important as they are? Merging don't doesn't mean that informations have to get lost. It's nothing wrong to have not the same opinien, and my one is that you are deleting too much too fast out Yes i know i am like to put in as much informations as possible,you handle it the opside, this is ok, but in my eyes your version is laking too much informations.So this is why I think other people should have a look at it (and don't be afraid they will delet out some of my text.) It is easyer to put in the whole text and then delet things out as put in informations one after one and check every time if it fit's. So lets wait and see what they think.FFA P-16 (talk) 13:40, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

You should only add relevant details, not every blurb you can find. The Banner talk 19:34, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

Well, not everyone has the same opinion, what is relevant and what not. In my opinion you deleting out to much, so i think its not bad that a 3rd party have a look at it.I deal a lot with swiss air force topic, so i have already sortet out what you call a blurb. Also why should the Super Puma Display and the Hornet Display not have this informations as part of the whol Swiss air Force Misplaced Pages page and on the other hand the Solo Türk and the F-16 Zeus have a own page on wikipedia? Bye FFA P-16 (talk) 21:20, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Military of Switzerland, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page M109. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 7 October 2014 (UTC)