Misplaced Pages

Talk:Eggcorn

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Cnilep (talk | contribs) at 23:05, 15 October 2014 (unsigned; refactor for chronological order). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 23:05, 15 October 2014 by Cnilep (talk | contribs) (unsigned; refactor for chronological order)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
WikiProject iconLinguistics Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics
???This article has not yet received a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
Articles for deletionThis article was nominated for deletion on 21 December 2006. The result of the discussion was keep/speedy keep.

Archives
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3
Archive 4Archive 5Archive 6

Debate / defend / reject / submit examples here

This topic is particularly necessary to clarify the relatively new topic of eggcorns.

I don't think this is an eggcorn as much as it is a simple misspelling. For a word misusage to be an eggcorn, the incorrect wording has to have something to do with the actual wording. What does "purging" have to do with "perjuring"?Acire93 (talk) 17:14, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
Again, I don't think this is an eggcorn as much as it is a simple misspelling. What does "peak" have to do with "peek"?Acire93 (talk) 17:14, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
  • In season 7, episode 8 of Friends, the character Joey causes amusement by using the phrase "moo point" for "moot point." When questioned, he explains the idiosyncratic logic behind his eggcorn: "It's like a cow's opinion: it's just doesn't matter. It's moo."<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4ifdqEmlx-I|title=Friends - moo point|publisher=YouTube|accessdate=2013-03-27}}</ref>
Added by IP 115.87.204.32 27 March 2013. Moved here by Cnilep (talk) 02:06, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
This is just a malapropism.Acire93 (talk) 17:14, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
And it only works with American pronunciation. It makes no sense in UK or Australian pronunciation. HiLo48 (talk) 05:45, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
  • yay or nay insted of yea or nay<ref>{{cite web |url=http://english.stackexchange.com/questions/817/is-yay-or-nay-an-acceptable-alternative-to-yea-or-nay |title=Is 'yay or nay' an acceptable alternative to 'yea or nay?' |publisher=English Language & Usage |accessdate=2013-08-08 }}</ref>
Added by User:Antiaverage (talk) 8 August 2013. Moved here by Cnilep (talk) 00:15, 9 August 2013 (UTC)
  • "the pot calling the kettle back" instead of "The pot calling the kettle black"<ref>{{http://en.wikipedia.org/The_pot_calling_the_kettle_black}}</ref>
  • "damp squid" instead of "Damp squib"<ref>{{http://en.wikipedia.org/Damp_squib}}</ref>
Two addition from 86.19.169.154, moved here by Cnilep (talk) 00:54, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
  • Step foot instead of set foot <ref>{{cite web|last=Howard|first=Ross|title=The Eggcornin' Bob Dylan|url=https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/alt.usage.english/pXM5SEMtuKk/WaA9j6ra4SkJ|work=alt.usage.english|accessdate=14 December 2013}}</ref> <ref>{{cite web|title=The Eggcorn Database|url=http://eggcorns.lascribe.net/english/101/step-foot/|accessdate=14 December 2013}}</ref> TypoBoy (talk) 05:15, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
  • "Sliding pond," which I first heard in the 1970's in a Brooklyn playground when a mother told her child to " go on the sliding pond.". I was perplexed until I saw the correct usage as follows: which should be " slide upon." Seen in Constance Garnet translation of "War and Peace." (User: Edwardtemple) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Edwardtemple (talk • contribs) 14:54, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
I grew up in Queens in the 1960s, and we called it a sliding pond, too. I haven't heard the term in years! Looking at the definition of eggcorn in the article, I'm not sure this qualifies. Whereas it is an idiosyncratic substitution, it's not clear what it's a substitution for. See this blog.. Since most people outside of New York City just call it a slide, I don't think this qualifies as an eggcorn. Paulmlieberman (talk) 18:26, 21 September 2014 (UTC)


Added by 219.92.166.243 at 07:34, 2 May 2014; moved here by Cnilep (talk) 07:54, 2 May 2014 (UTC)

I feel like this one should be added; I've heard it plenty and it actually is an eggcorn and not a malapropism (unlike a lot of the examples given above)Acire93 (talk) 17:14, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

Darrell Duane 07:27, 29 June 2014 (UTC)

  • would of instead of would've

75.84.83.45 (talk) 05:38, 31 August 2014 (UTC)

  • 'Penn State Nifty Lions' instead of 'Penn State Nittany Lions'

guest user — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.97.94.221 (talk) 19:46, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

  • Cutting the mustard instead of cutting the muster. This is very common. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Menme (talk • contribs) 08:34, 15 October 2014

Add a List instead of / in addition to the examples

Having the examples is nice, but I also think a list of these would be welcome, especially for people wondering which form is the correct form of a word. --Harikawashi (talk) 08:16, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

There are currently links to two lists of eggcorns in the External links section. A new stand alone list on Misplaced Pages might be created subject to policies on notability and verifiability, as well as the standards described at Misplaced Pages:Manual of Style/Stand-alone lists. Cnilep (talk) 02:10, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

Moving from here to the article

At what point are items deemed important enough to move to the main article? We can't just keep a list on the talk page without having some sort of process for moving qualified candidates to the article, otherwise they remain here forever. Sp!ke (talk) 14:14, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

Much as there is no deadline, there is no hard and fast rule for when or why to change the examples in the article. Note, by the way, that the examples are not "important enough" to be included; they are illustrative of the phenomenon. There is a suggestion, above, to create a stand-alone list, which presumably would include all notable (not quite the same thing as "important") examples meeting its criteria for inclusion.
In practice, most example languish here until the list gets too long and is moved to a talk archive. The last example added to the article was preying mantis in February 2012. Preying mantis had actually been in the article until December 2011. Before that expatriot was added in July 2010. These were added because editors discussed them on this page and decided they were better examples than rot iron and old-timer's disease, respectively. Cnilep (talk) 01:53, 4 July 2013 (UTC)

I favor moving the "for all intensive purposes" example to the page now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Xplodotron (talk • contribs) 18:53, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

I agreeAcire93 (talk) 17:14, 4 June 2014 (UTC)


Individuals Known for Eggcorns Section

I think it would be nice to add a section where we discuss (or at least list) people (real people and fictional characters) who are known for their eggcorns. One example that comes to mind is Ricky from Trailer Park Boys, whose eggcorns and malapropisms have been nicknamed "Rickyisms" by fans. Rickyisms include "escape goat" for scapegoat, "incubaker" for incubator, "Juniper" for Jupiter, "Vacational School" for vocational school, and "Survival of the Fitness" for survival of the fittest.

What do people think of the idea of including a section of this sort? Or is it more that when someone's plays on words achieve that level of notability it warrants a separate entry? For example, we of course have an entry for Spoonerisms. Probably nobody else will ever achieve the notability of Spooner in this respect, but there are some others who are also famous for plays on words, and I am thinking that for those who are particularly known for their eggcorns, it might be nice to note such things in the eggcorn article. Thoughts? Tamarleigh (talk) 05:40, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

No objection in principle, but I'd be surprised if there were enough such individuals to merit a separate section. Based on the examples you've given, it looks like most Rickyisms aren't eggcorns. (Only one of the five examples, "incubaker", looks like an eggcorn to me.) Do you know of any reliable sources that link Ricky to eggcorns? The show's producer says something about him in this video, but my internet isn't working well enough for me to see it. Adrian J. Hunter 11:41, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
Here's my transcription of producers Barrie Dunn and Mike Volpe's remarks from the video Adrian J. Hunter linked to. (I may have missed some words, but this is roughly accurate.)
Dunn: We call them Rickyisms because these things are things that Ricky says, or mistakes. We call them 'Rickyisms', but it's all these phrases or expressions that Ricky comes out with that totally changes the original meaning. Actually, the meaning is better than the original.
Volpe: Oh, it's- you understand the meaning.
Dunn: He takes words and he, and he uses them wrong.
They call the words "Rickyisms" and "mistakes", but not "eggcorns". Cnilep (talk) 03:27, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
  1. "The Grammarphobia Blog: Slip sliding away". Retrieved 21 Sep 2014. {{cite web}}: line feed character in |title= at position 25 (help)
Categories: