This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Unbroken Chain (talk | contribs) at 11:01, 8 November 2014 (Adding new report for Ellapura. (TW)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 11:01, 8 November 2014 by Unbroken Chain (talk | contribs) (Adding new report for Ellapura. (TW))(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Ellapura
Ellapura (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Ellapura/Archive.
08 November 2014
– A user has requested CheckUser. An SPI clerk will shortly look at the case and endorse or decline the request.
- Suspected sockpuppets
- Rathinavel Raj K (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Machupichu5678 (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
- Editor interaction utility
I think we have a situation of meatpuppetry most likely and possibly sockpuppetry. All account edits are to the one subject and that is in promotion for one persons theory. Keep votes are largely the same rationale. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 11:01, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Categories: