This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Jewbo WaIes, LOL (talk | contribs) at 21:09, 11 July 2006. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 21:09, 11 July 2006 by Jewbo WaIes, LOL (talk | contribs)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)List of food topics
Listcurft. Certainly incomplete and potenially very huge list. Would work much better as a category, if there isn't one already. -- Koffieyahoo 04:27, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as unwieldy, indiscriminate collection of information.--Fuhghettaboutit 04:38, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per above. Zos 04:41, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as unmaintainable and overly broad. Deleuze 04:43, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per above. -- Gogo Dodo 06:42, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, unmaintainable indiscriminate list (WP:NOT). --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 12:55, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Why do people create these articles? Rob 13:22, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per Deleuze. Green caterpillar 21:31, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
- Keep -- Food-related is pretty straight-forward, and discriminant. The purpose of the list is to present all the food-related topics on the 'pedia, which is useful for monitoring the subject area as per Misplaced Pages:List guideline. The subject "food-related" is of much narrower scope than the list of mathematics articles, which has grown so large that it now consists of 27 component lists (one for each letter of the alphabet, and another for digits)!
| Part of a series on | ||
| Mathematics | ||
|---|---|---|
|
||
 Mathematics Portal | ||
The list for the letter A alone is larger than all the lists I've built combined!!! And then there's the mathematics topic lists and the list of mathematicians (which is 166 kilobytes long!). That food shouldn't be afforded similar treatment doesn't make any sense, especially considering the central role it plays in all of our lives. If the approach is okay to take on the far broader subjects of Mathematics, Philosophy, Biology, etc., then why isn't it appropriate for the narrower subject of food? Your stance doesn't make any sense. Please explain. --Transhumanist 20:21, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
- What I think is unmaintainable is that there are way too many food-related topics, because one could include list of foods, food agencies, meal types, etc. Green caterpillar 21:05, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
- Abstain. I abstain. --Jewbo WaIes, LOL 21:09, 11 July 2006 (UTC)