This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk | contribs) at 17:25, 11 November 2014 (hey, here's another amendment request, just because arbs like formal procedures so much). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 17:25, 11 November 2014 by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk | contribs) (hey, here's another amendment request, just because arbs like formal procedures so much)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Amendment request: Discretionary sanctions
Initiated by Fut.Perf. at 17:25, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
- Clauses to which an amendment is requested
Statement by Fut.Perf.
Just noticed this trivial clerical oversight in the wording of the current DS rules. In the "WP:AC/DS#Continuity" section, there is the the rule that old warnings are grandfathered in until "twelve months from the date of the passing of the motion authorising this procedure" – but nowhere on the page does it say when that date actually was (3 May 2014, apparently), nor is there an actual link to the decision anywhere, and it took me ages just now to dig that bloody link out . Just add a reference to that date there, and a link to decision in the refs section at the bottom, because it will remain important for admins in figuring out the "alert" status of editors for the next half year to come.
Of course, if Arbcom pages weren't such a ridiculous jungle of bureaucracy, I could just go ahead and make this simple, uncontroversial clerical correction myself (heck, per IAR, I guess I'll just do it anyway ), but since on prior attempts arbitrators have ever so gracefully insisted on the untouchableness of their little home-made bureaucratic fiefdom , you asked for ridiculous procedure for procedure's sake, you get ridiculous procedure for procedure's sake. Have fun voting on this. Fut.Perf. ☼ 17:25, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
Statement by {other user}
{Other editors are free to comment on this amendment as necessary. Comments here should be directed only at the above proposed amendment.}
Statement by {yet another user}
Clerk notes
- This section is for administrative notes by the clerks (including clerk recusals).