This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Unbroken Chain (talk | contribs) at 16:32, 23 November 2014 (Adding new report for Pearljambandaid. (TW)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 16:32, 23 November 2014 by Unbroken Chain (talk | contribs) (Adding new report for Pearljambandaid. (TW))(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Pearljambandaid
Pearljambandaid (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Populated account categories: confirmed
For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Pearljambandaid/Archive.
23 November 2014
– A user has requested CheckUser. An SPI clerk will shortly look at the case and endorse or decline the request.
- Suspected sockpuppets
- JacoreyBarkley (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
- Editor interaction utility
Another sock to add to the farm,. miraculous arrival for the AFD discussion which can be held without or at least the influence of the six or so other socks found in last checkuser. Can we please checkuser tor other accounts for afd manipulation. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 16:32, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Categories: