Misplaced Pages

'Recent Change Patrol' Mistakes
When patrolling 'recent changes,' mistakes can occur. If I revert a legitimate edit, mistaking it for vandalism please leave me a kind and courteous message alerting me of my misunderstanding and I will take full responsibility for my actions. Sincere apologies will be offered to all involved so please don't be angry with me, I'm just trying to improve Misplaced Pages.

Please note: I am not a bot. I use huggle, which allows me to make a lot of edits in a short amount time. I will answer your message after I am done . Thank you.

Template:Archive box collapsible

http://youtube.com/2CkCNKSx8ok?t=3m34s Provodnikov says he is proud to be Matthew Dude I am being constructive

My changes.

I dont care if you change the biography. Even when I read it the news and dates were all off. You can do what you want, these living people have poor biography citations. It is not wise to trust them.

change on "red mercury"

i put that there as an alert to a moderator that there is misleading and incorrect data there. the sentence talks about mercury iodide, a known compound and describes it after the first part of the sentence misleads about it being a hoax compound red mercury.

see vvv

"According to the hoax, mercuric iodide is a poisonous, odorless, tasteless, water-insoluble scarlet-red powder that becomes yellow when heated above 126 °C, due to a thermochromatic change in crystalline structure."

no, it is not a hoax, it is a real compound called mercury iodide that has those properties. this is wrong and the compound/substance in question is red mercury, whatever it may be.

Avono

I've put a source. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Semo93 (talk • contribs) 17:01, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

Italic text

thank you for helping open a page in your website. Although I had typed an item about our own history, I failed to insert relevant pictures of our area. I need a tutorial techniques ofd how to insert them.

Regards,

Loboka Francis — Preceding unsigned comment added by Loboka2020 (talk • contribs) 17:33, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

You have been accused (I'm not sure if that's the right word) on the General sanctions page

here as far as I can tell you haven't been alerted. HalfHat 11:36, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

@Halfhat: Sigh, was already making a statement while you were notifying me. I sometimes wonder If this drama is worth the effort Avono (talk) 11:44, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

Yeah, after ArbCom, I might just call it quits and move on. HalfHat 12:17, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

Ulmus minor subspecies sarniensis.

Hello. The source I cited at the end of these two sentences that you deleted -

Its clonal origin is (to date) suspected rather than proved, but the uniformity of this taxon makes it virtually certain to be a clone. Arguing in a 2002 paper that there was no clear distinction between species and subspecies, and suggesting that known or suspected clones of U. minor, once cultivated and named, should be treated as cultivars, Dr Max Coleman of Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh preferred the designation U. minor 'Sarniensis'.

- supports the second sentence; the first sentence was the same author's response to my query about the second sentence. The two go together. But I'm happy to add "apparent". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.32.51.236 (talk) 11:39, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

@194.32.51.236: Thanks for replying, I have no further objections. Feel free to continue with said changes. Avono (talk) 12:07, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

1. Coleman M. (2002) 'British elms.' British Wildlife 13 (6): 390-395.

General Sanctions Notification

Please read this notification carefully:
A community discussion has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to the Gamergate controversy.
The details of these sanctions are described here.

General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.

I know you were already aware of the situation, but this is to try and resolve the current complaint. Hasteur (talk) 13:44, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

German Broadcasting Company

Thanks for your input at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/German Broadcasting Company (GBC). While Reichs-Rundfunk-Gesellschaft isn't one of my primary areas of interest, the article would certainly benefit from improvements. NorthAmerica 10:47, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

yeah, might finally be my excuse for getting that library pass from my local university. Will be firstly making a resource request for the recommended reading mentioned in the German version of the article. Avono (talk) 11:00, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

Cool to follow up. If you'd like, I can provide you with a list of a few hundred additional articles that would benefit from the addition of book and journal sources that are not available online. NorthAmerica 11:31, 4 December 2014 (UTC)