This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Joe Decker (talk | contribs) at 01:20, 17 December 2014 (Undid revision 638424894 by Joe Decker (talk) good faith reopen to allow a comment that was said to be in progress when I closed). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 01:20, 17 December 2014 by Joe Decker (talk | contribs) (Undid revision 638424894 by Joe Decker (talk) good faith reopen to allow a comment that was said to be in progress when I closed)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Jayden Jaymes
- Jayden Jaymes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Jayden Jaymes fails WP:Pornbio. Her AVN awards were in bogus categories. She has no mainstream popularity (appearing on MTV is not enough). She has no major contributions to pornography. Redban (talk) 22:13, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:51, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:52, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:53, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
- Keep. She passes WP:PORNBIO because she has won a well-known and significant industry award; AVN's Best Body fan award in 2014, and she has been featured multiple times in notable mainstream media; she has a lot more than just an MTV appearance. Winning two fan voted awards over a period of five years is evidence that she also passes WP:ENTERTAINER's criteria #2 which states "Has a large fan base or a significant "cult" following". Rebecca1990 (talk) 08:50, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
- I'm not sure that Fan-Awards is enough; it simply shows that many people went online and clicked on her name. It's akin to citing google search totals. She also fails WP:GNG. The sources on her page are iafd, imdb, jaydenjaymesxxx, fameawards, AVN, XBiz, and Fameawards, all of which are not independent. The one reliable, secondary, independent source would be Jezebel.com, and this article focuses on Jayden's performance in MTV:True Life, not her pornography career. Redban (talk) 18:43, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
- Comment - All the current IMDB citations in this article here prove is that she was in a few, mostly minor, mainstream media appearances, although she was indeed featured in the MTV True Life TV episode that she was in. All of the citations to some of her apparent, past blog posts are currently dead, and the info that they supposedly cite doesn't really add any notability to her anyways. The real relevant standard for sources here is that they are independent of the subject of the article, which here is Jayden James, not the industry that a subject happens to appear mostly or partially in. Guy1890 (talk) 06:48, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
- Keep: As said by others: as she has won several AVN awards, she passes WP:PORNBIO. -- fdewaele, 11 December 2014, 19:00 CET
- Keep per everyone above - passes WP:PORNBIO + WP:GNG. –Davey2010 • (talk) 17:35, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
- Keep - win, so meets the requirements. Subtropical-man talk
(en-2) 21:04, 14 December 2014 (UTC) - Comment This was originally closed as a clear Keep by myself, however, the NAC closure was contested as "too early". I've reverted myself and this AfD is again open for discussion. Dusti 22:09, 16 December 2014 (UTC)