This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Johnsoniensis (talk | contribs) at 16:16, 13 January 2015 (rating). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 16:16, 13 January 2015 by Johnsoniensis (talk | contribs) (rating)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Australia B‑class | ||||||||||||||||
|
Sociology B‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||
|
No merge
There is no reason at all to merge this with a larger entry that lists various common Euro-American wedding participants. If anything such an entry should link to this as the main entry.PelleSmith (talk) 14:53, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
I agree. The Australian Civil Celebrant is genuinely unique and other Western Countries are still struggling to absorb the complex of concepts. (Citizen-Gladiator) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Citizen-Gladiator (talk • contribs) 19:53, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
..and New Zealand
This term, celebrant is also used in New Zealand. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Galaxyporpoise (talk • contribs) 06:39, 28 February 2010 (UTC) -- I intend to put in a section in on New Zealand as soon as I can find a reliable source. (Citizen-Gladiator) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Citizen-Gladiator (talk • contribs) 19:50, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
Categories: