Misplaced Pages

User talk:Mosmof

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Mosmof (talk | contribs) at 16:28, 28 January 2015 (→Liverpool FC: resp). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 16:28, 28 January 2015 by Mosmof (talk | contribs) (→Liverpool FC: resp)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Archiving icon
Archives
  1. January-February 2007
  2. January-June 2008
  3. July-December 2008
  4. January-December 2009
  5. January-June 2010
  6. July-December 2010
  7. January-December 2011
  8. March-November 2012
  9. January-November 2013
  10. January-December 2014


NYCFC

Shouldn't the team nick name come from the fans? Because that's how teams get their nick names — Preceding unsigned comment added by Only1bigc (talk • contribs) 18:27, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 26 January

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:24, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Liverpool FC

Hi Mosmof, Could i just inquire about the reasons as to why you constantly remove my contributions to the 'rivalries' section Liverpool FC page? You did say it was my POV but It's actually a factual account complete with (though incorrectly inserted) cited reference. The overall section on the rivalries is miss leading to the casual reader as it is, as there really should be a 'citation needed' insert at the end of the "rivalry intensified after Manchester Utd became the first English team to win a European cup" line. To say Liverpool's four European cup wins coincided with their domination of English football is a fact bore out by their Honours list in the same article aswell as my referenced add-on. I do think the overall section is miss leading to the casual reader without it.Richie bedfellows (talk) 09:06, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for leaving a message. My thinking is that "domination" is a little bit of a peacock term and the reader would be served better by simply stating the numbers (and looking at that passage again, I should probably edit the part about Manchester United "dominating" English football as well.
FYI, this edit broke the formatting on the page - when you have a line break followed by a period, it messes up the rest of the line.
Again, thanks - let me know if my latest edit works for you. Mosmof (talk) 16:28, 28 January 2015 (UTC)