Misplaced Pages

User talk:Mosmof

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Mosmof (talk | contribs) at 14:46, 30 January 2015 (→Sheriff's Office). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 14:46, 30 January 2015 by Mosmof (talk | contribs) (→Sheriff's Office)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Archiving icon
Archives
  1. January-February 2007
  2. January-June 2008
  3. July-December 2008
  4. January-December 2009
  5. January-June 2010
  6. July-December 2010
  7. January-December 2011
  8. March-November 2012
  9. January-November 2013
  10. January-December 2014


NYCFC

Shouldn't the team nick name come from the fans? Because that's how teams get their nick names — Preceding unsigned comment added by Only1bigc (talk • contribs) 18:27, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 26 January

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:24, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Liverpool FC

Hi Mosmof, Could i just inquire about the reasons as to why you constantly remove my contributions to the 'rivalries' section Liverpool FC page? You did say it was my POV but It's actually a factual account complete with (though incorrectly inserted) cited reference. The overall section on the rivalries is miss leading to the casual reader as it is, as there really should be a 'citation needed' insert at the end of the "rivalry intensified after Manchester Utd became the first English team to win a European cup" line. To say Liverpool's four European cup wins coincided with their domination of English football is a fact bore out by their Honours list in the same article aswell as my referenced add-on. I do think the overall section is miss leading to the casual reader without it.Richie bedfellows (talk) 09:06, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for leaving a message. My thinking is that "domination" is a little bit of a peacock term and the reader would be served better by simply stating the numbers (and looking at that passage again, I should probably edit the part about Manchester United "dominating" English football as well.
FYI, this edit broke the formatting on the page - when you have a line break followed by a period, it messes up the rest of the line.
Again, thanks - let me know if my latest edit works for you. Mosmof (talk) 16:28, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Hi, thank you for the prompt response and the appropriate re-editing.Also apologies for the mix-up with the format. Just one more point, i do also feel the line mentioned about the rivalry intensifying in the 60's after Manchester Utd's European cup win is also a little dubious and slightly miss-leading to the casual reader. I do feel if this is the case then it either needs a citation or i could reference claims that the rivalry actually intensified in the 1970's after Liverpool started their successful period with their first of their eleven league titles in that period. thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Richie bedfellows (talk • contribs) 18:52, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Coop City

Coop City is not a police force, just look at their own website. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 14.136.236.207 (talk) 19:48, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

There's nothing indicating they're not a private police force. In fact, their badge features the words "N.Y. POLICE" and their Twitter handle is titled "Co-Op City Police" and its website features a logo with the word "community policing at its finest". So yeah, if we go by their own description, CC Public Safety is indeed a police force. Mosmof (talk) 20:27, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Sheriff's Office

Stop deleting information regarding the Sheriff's Office. If your not a member of that agency and don't have any sources for the reason your deleting things, then it's unreasonable for you just to delete information without knowing the facts. It is disrespectful and offensive to the hardworking officers of that agency. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.6.227.50 (talk • contribs) 14:41, 30 January 2015

Actually, being part of a department is a good reason not to edit the information on the page. Anything you include need to be easily verifiable using independent, third-party sources. Mosmof (talk) 14:46, 30 January 2015 (UTC)