This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Byrgenwulf (talk | contribs) at 17:56, 19 July 2006 (→[]: Delete). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 17:56, 19 July 2006 by Byrgenwulf (talk | contribs) (→[]: Delete)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Psychotronics
- Psychotronics was nominated for deletion on 2004-12-31. The result of the discussion was "keep". For the prior discussion, see Misplaced Pages:Votes for deletion/Psychotronics.
IMHO, cannot be made into an encyclopedia-worthy article -- Writtenonsand 23:23, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete appears to be a longstanding but non-mainstream newage neologism with no real fixed meaning. I'd be for keeping it if it were fixed or a menaing could be nailed down, but like the niminator I doubt that it's possible. Artw
- Keep based on previous vote for keep, even if only for historical reasons Antares33712 14:52, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. It needs watching to keep people from turning it into a promotion of the ideas involved, but I don't agree that it cannot be made into an encyclopedia-worthy article. -- Antaeus Feldspar 19:03, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete: this doesn't seem to be an encyclopaedic. Byrgenwulf 17:56, 19 July 2006 (UTC)