This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Randykitty (talk | contribs) at 22:50, 15 February 2015 (→Disruptive editing: r). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 22:50, 15 February 2015 by Randykitty (talk | contribs) (→Disruptive editing: r)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
 Archives |
|
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Hi, and welcome to my User Talk page! For new discussions, please add your comments at the very bottom and use a section heading (e.g., by using the "+" tab, or, depending on your settings, the "new section" tab at the top of this page). I will respond on this page unless specifically requested otherwise. I dislike talk-back templates and fragmented discussions. If I post on your page you may assume that I will watch it for a response. If you post here I will assume the same (and that you lost interest if you stop following the discussion).
IF YOU CAME HERE BECAUSE I DELETED AN ARTICLE: Please see WP:REFUND first. Thanks.
|
Misplaced Pages is no place for humour. Everything is very serious here and we are all terrifically important. |
Congrats
In helping, earlier, to affirm the non-independent status quo at the GM Church article, it's ongoing as well that Prof Church, pursuant creating a spousal Prof Wu article, now carte blanch cross-contributes as well. A literal case of what is good for the goose, is good for the gander. Well, if our esteemed Wales of a founder can edit from rarified social events, articles on persons present based on his immediate personal experience, then tweet about it and have it is picked up by the NYT (see , page-searching "Jimmy"), then it is clear, isn't it, that some animals, such as Wales or geese, are more equal than others. My last word: all that transpires at Church is not above reproach. Cheers, no more to do or say. Le Prof.
Afd for Deeplink (company)
On 2015-01-04, over a month ago, User:Vrac listed Deeplink (company) for deletion. As the creator, I explained why I disagreed but felt ineligible to vote. It received one (other) Delete.
On 2015-01-12, User:Northamerica1000 relisted it. It then acquired a Speedy Keep and one more Delete.
You again relisted it on 201501-24. Since then it has received another Keep.
I believe that with two Deletes and two Keeps in over a month, (plus the original nomination and my non-voting objection,) it is maybe time to close with No Consensus.
If you agree, would you please do the honors?
And if you disagree, could you please tell me why?
Either way, thanks. --Eliyahu S 14:41, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
- I agree, done! --Randykitty (talk) 18:00, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
A journal page
Hello Randykitty, about a month ago I made last modifications to a draft page. However, it is still pending review. Would you kindly have a look at it and take the necessary action? The URL is: https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Draft:Aging_and_Disease_%28Journal%29&oldid=641813858 -- ] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rogen123 (talk • contribs) 18:45, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
- Hi, I did some cleanup and added some stuff. The journal meets WP:NJournals, so I have accepted the draft and moved it to mainspace: Aging and Disease. Thanks for your contributions! --Randykitty (talk) 11:03, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
Hello Randikitty, Awesome. Many thanks. In fact I am the one to be thankful to you for your yeoman service. User:Rogen123 — Preceding undated comment added 23:16, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
My bad, not your fault!
it apprears someone deleted a bunch of citations (newspapers etc. then, when you came along, it was all uncited. fixing the mess!!! Please accept appologies for mouthing off! It was not your fault, your deletions were based on what was left. I'll get these straitened out over the next few days. Herpetology2 (talk) 02:23, 10 February 2015 (UTC)herpetology2
Kazimira Danutė Prunskienė was born in Ostland
You deleted my edit of place of birth in this page
http://lt.wikipedia.org/Kazimira_Prunskien%C4%97
Please be professional and revert it back, as this is an accurate geopolitical entity in which this person was born
Thank you, and best regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.55.18.13 (talk) 13:57, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
- Nope, doesn't sound convincing to me. Attempting to put a Nazi flag on a bio for a former PM of Lithuania needs, I think, consensus on the talk page first (and I doubt you'll get it). --Randykitty (talk) 14:11, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
- Here's an analogy of the policy that is common on Lithuanian Misplaced Pages: http://lt.wikipedia.org/Aleksandras_Stulginskis . The second president of Lithuania has both the flag of Russian Empire as it is official geopolitical entity of his birth, and the flag of Soviet Lithuania, as it is his official place of death. As of 1943, official flag used in Lithuania was the Nazi Germany flag. Please use logic here, not the feelings that is summoned by the sight of Nazi flag. Misplaced Pages is not the place for this kind of PC, as if that would be the case, the Nazi flag should be deleted from all the Misplaced Pages entries that it is used in. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.55.18.13 (talk) 14:27, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
- Get consensus for this edit on the article's talk page and you can add it. Until then, it's a no-no. --Randykitty (talk) 14:29, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
- Here's an analogy of the policy that is common on Lithuanian Misplaced Pages: http://lt.wikipedia.org/Aleksandras_Stulginskis . The second president of Lithuania has both the flag of Russian Empire as it is official geopolitical entity of his birth, and the flag of Soviet Lithuania, as it is his official place of death. As of 1943, official flag used in Lithuania was the Nazi Germany flag. Please use logic here, not the feelings that is summoned by the sight of Nazi flag. Misplaced Pages is not the place for this kind of PC, as if that would be the case, the Nazi flag should be deleted from all the Misplaced Pages entries that it is used in. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.55.18.13 (talk) 14:27, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
my pages
Please cease deleting random material based on your OPINION that seems to be restricted to your esoteric part of academia. You clearly have no background in our discipline, or you are clearly just deleting stuff to be a jerk. UPDATE: I have requested Misplaced Pages block you from my pages. I am posting this in accordance with their policies. Herpetology2 (talk) 04:22, 11 February 2015 (UTC)herpetology2
ANI
There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is please block randkitty. Thank you. (This is a procedural notice; I personally have no opinion on the matter.) Erpert 04:48, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks for letting me know, I have responded there. --Randykitty (talk) 08:59, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Admin's Barnstar |
| You're one of those admins that actually have a big part in keeping Misplaced Pages up and running, thanks for that. Since Saturday's Valentine's, please accept a box of chocolates too. Happy editing, :) AmaryllisGardener 03:53, 13 February 2015 (UTC) |
- MMM, chocolates... my favorite food! :-)) Thanks! --Randykitty (talk) 08:18, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
Nobo Ice Cream
Aaaaarghhh!. My stupidity, thanks for being so gentle. Fixed now Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:43, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
- I know people who never make any mistakes (and certainly no stupid ones), but that's not the people who keep this place going with lots of hard work, like yourself! :-) --Randykitty (talk) 08:17, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
Disruptive editing
Please do not attack other editors, as you did on Misplaced Pages:Articles_for_deletion/Michael_Viscardi_(3rd_nomination). Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. 206.125.140.113 (talk) 16:12, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
- Nonsense. --Randykitty (talk) 17:09, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
- The purpose of AfD is not to scrutinize user behavior, it's to decide whether to delete articles. Your improper comment in which you cast aspersions and which you now restored, is highly inappropriate. It contains no evidence, and doesn't contribute to the relevant afd discussion. Matter of fact, it's disruptive. It derails the discussion, fails to assume good faith, and casts aspersions. Either remove it or I will be taking this to ani. If you think you can pull off stunts like that just because you're an admin, think again. 206.125.140.113 (talk) 17:57, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
- For someone who likes to dish it out, you're mightily easy offended. There was nothing wrong with my comment and you can take it to ANI all you like. --Randykitty (talk) 19:55, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
- Aight, I'll assume good faith, assume it's a CIR issue, and educate you on why your comment ("looking at your own editing record, I have the definite impression that this is not your first account either") is inappropriate.
- The purpose of AfD is not to scrutinize user behavior, it's to decide whether to delete articles. Your improper comment in which you cast aspersions and which you now restored, is highly inappropriate. It contains no evidence, and doesn't contribute to the relevant afd discussion. Matter of fact, it's disruptive. It derails the discussion, fails to assume good faith, and casts aspersions. Either remove it or I will be taking this to ani. If you think you can pull off stunts like that just because you're an admin, think again. 206.125.140.113 (talk) 17:57, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
- One, because it's at afd which is a place to discuss the notability, etc. of articles, and not your personal blog/rfcu/spi/the talk page of the guy you're accusing of sockpuppetry. Two, because it fails to assume good faith. Three, because it's accusing a user of misconduct while providing no evidence (see WP:ASPERSIONS). Four, because it sets a bad example. Admins are expected to lead by example, what example does your off-topic bad-faith-assuming unsubstantiated-accusations comment set for other users? Yeah.
- Now you can't claim you don't know what's wrong with it. I'm generously giving you one last chance to delete the comment of your own volition. 206.125.140.113 (talk) 20:56, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
- Thank you, that's very generous of you, but I'm passing the opportunity. Next time you come here, please log in first. Any further IP messages will be deleted. --Randykitty (talk) 22:50, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
- Now you can't claim you don't know what's wrong with it. I'm generously giving you one last chance to delete the comment of your own volition. 206.125.140.113 (talk) 20:56, 15 February 2015 (UTC)