This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Knowledgekid87 (talk | contribs) at 19:41, 19 February 2015 (→Comments by other users: More). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 19:41, 19 February 2015 by Knowledgekid87 (talk | contribs) (→Comments by other users: More)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)ItsLassieTime
ItsLassieTime (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected
For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/ItsLassieTime/Archive.
A long-term abuse case exists at Misplaced Pages:Long-term abuse/ItsLassieTime.
19 February 2015
– This SPI case is open.
- Suspected sockpuppets
- Rationalobserver (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
- Editor interaction utility
- ItsLassieTime has had many confirmed socks, (see Category:Misplaced Pages sockpuppets of ItsLassieTime), and I've scrubbed quite a lot of the work done by the various accounts, but mostly work done by the account Susanne2009NYC. A couple of days ago I saw an edit summary that made me think of that account. This RO comment is similar in tone this Susanne2009NYC comment. Yesterday I saw this RO comment on SlimVirgin's talk page and it struck me as equally similar.
- Because I've spent so much time scrutinizing ItsLassieTime's work, , , , , I decided to take a look at Rose-Baley Party, which RO wrote. I found the source online here, and only ten pages in found these instances of close paraphrasing that I posted to the talk page here. I also posted here to talk Irataba because the same material is in both articles, but that post got reverted, . I've pinged Moonriddengirl and am pinging Ruhrfisch who also might recognize the style. I did have a fair amount of harassment from ItsLassietime on my talk and might have some old IPs but at this point I believe it would all be stale and we have to go on behavioral patterns. Also pinging Montanabw, who I believe, knows ItsLassietime from one of the other accounts.
- Less telling, but still are these edit summaries using "oops" or a variation of it, found on a very quick scan of contribs, RO here, and Susanne here on the first rev-deleted edit. Thanks. Victoria (tk) 18:33, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
- Really? I'm the only person who's ever used the word "oops" in an edit summary? Here's a whole page you using "oops" in edit summaries. Rationalobserver (talk) 19:02, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
- Comment - I don't see a connection here. If you are going to use the word "oops" for example to compare edit summaries that strikes me is a bit bizzare. The rest is just a he said she said argument. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 19:40, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Categories: