This is an old revision of this page, as edited by OccultZone (talk | contribs) at 00:36, 13 March 2015 (→Comments by other users: re). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 00:36, 13 March 2015 by OccultZone (talk | contribs) (→Comments by other users: re)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Bazaan
Bazaan (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected
For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Bazaan/Archive.
10 March 2015
– An SPI clerk has requested administrator assistance for action regarding the case below. The requested action is below.
- Suspected sockpuppets
- Rainmaker23 (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- 203.112.78.254 (talk · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
- Editor interaction utility
Confession made while logged out on user page. Previously he confirmed that this IP is indeed his. While discussing at ANI, I was looking into the histories of several Bangladesh related articles and I found a stunning similarity between behavior of Uck22 (sock of Bazaan) and interestingly, Rainmaker23 emerged soon after Uck22 & Co. got blocked for sock-puppetry in June 2014. When Rainmaker23 became active in some articles related to WikiProject:Bangladesh he appeared to be much more experience than his login's age. – nafSadh did say 15:25, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
- So you're saying you WP:OWN WP Bangladesh articles? No new users are allowed to edit them? Have I harmed any of these pages? I'm pretty sure I've done my bit improving them, and there's a scope to do a lot more. But of course that won't be possible when they're monitored by the likes of you.--Rainmaker23 (talk) 21:22, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
- That "page blanking" is more than sufficient. Also he created Rainmaker23 about 6 days after the block of Uck22. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 17:03, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
- I never blanked any page other than my own user and talk pages, and I only did so after placing the retirement tag. I once reduced a convoluted POV centric article to a paragraph, considering the notability of the subject. Nafsadh seems to think its page blanking. He's a little weasel. Also, Bazaan got himself blocked, expressedly. No real sock puppetry here. Not a single controversial edit.--Rainmaker23 (talk) 21:08, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
- When you are trying to claim that how none of your edits are bad and how much different you are from Bazaan, you forgets that you are digging your own grave. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 00:36, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
- I never blanked any page other than my own user and talk pages, and I only did so after placing the retirement tag. I once reduced a convoluted POV centric article to a paragraph, considering the notability of the subject. Nafsadh seems to think its page blanking. He's a little weasel. Also, Bazaan got himself blocked, expressedly. No real sock puppetry here. Not a single controversial edit.--Rainmaker23 (talk) 21:08, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Clerk note: 
Looks like a duck to me (see: ). Admin needed. Vanjagenije (talk) 14:59, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Categories: