This is an old revision of this page, as edited by T3dkjn89q00vl02Cxp1kqs3x7 (talk | contribs) at 13:49, 14 March 2015 (→March 2015: d). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 13:49, 14 March 2015 by T3dkjn89q00vl02Cxp1kqs3x7 (talk | contribs) (→March 2015: d)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff) | Karlhard is busy on weekend due to work and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
 Archives |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Hi, welcome to my talk page, please be patient when talking with me. I won't answer to rude messages. Don't forget to sign your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~)
Please click New Section for a message. Thanks
Excellent New Editor Barnstar
|
The Excellent New Editor's Barnstar A new editor on the right path | |
| Amazing! You've only been with us for 3 months and already have over 300 unique pages edited! Please do not be discouraged by the nominations for deletion. I will try to help you defend the existence of these articles, but next time try to keep in mind guidelines such as WP:Notability, WP:Independent, and WP:NOT before writing. In any case, great job and keep up the good work! Even experienced editors like me have articles deleted. If you really think a subject you're written about should meet the above guidelines but you don't have time to fight it, don't be afraid to request that the article be moved to your WP:userspace so you can work on it at your own pace. —CodeHydro 18:29, 18 December 2014 (UTC) |
- Hydro is right here - despite the above templates I'd be more than happy to help you out improving these others you've created, as I believe most can be easily expanded:
- A couple of others may have notability issues but I can discuss those with you before taking any further action. Let me know what you think, Nikthestunned 12:38, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks for your support, I will keep adding more and improving the existents. I would appreciate your help. Have a happy new year.
Done. Karlhard 19:23, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks for your support, I will keep adding more and improving the existents. I would appreciate your help. Have a happy new year.
Your experience with Misplaced Pages so far
Welcome to Misplaced Pages! I am conducting a quick survey about newcomer support and I would like to hear about your experience so far. Your response will go a long way to help us build a better experience for newcomers like yourself. The survey will take you around 10 minutes to complete.
To learn more about the study, visit this link: https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Co-op
To take the survey, visit this link: https://syracuseuniversity.qualtrics.com/SE/?SID=SV_2bnPZz0HelBaY85
Thanks!
Gabrielm199 (talk) 03:55, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
A beer for you!
|
Hi, thanks for create that page . Please take a look at bio that I updated . And about the need of more links to integrate on wikipedia, how can we do that? Please help with that . Thank you very much. Carlossilva1971 (talk) 23:31, 17 January 2015 (UTC) |
Proposed deletion of Bijoux 22
The article Bijoux 22 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Fails WP:NALBUMS
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Logical Cowboy (talk) 17:29, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Forte Sounds
The article Forte Sounds has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Weakly sourced article fails WP:CORPDEPTH
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Logical Cowboy (talk) 17:40, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
Nomination of EastGate Pharmaceuticals for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article EastGate Pharmaceuticals is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/EastGate Pharmaceuticals (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Logical Cowboy (talk) 18:40, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
Nomination of Bikini Luxe for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bikini Luxe is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Bikini Luxe (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Logical Cowboy (talk) 01:55, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
Nomination of David Banks (American actor) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article David Banks (American actor) is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/David Banks (American actor) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 17:21, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
- Hi, I was wondering why you would think (per your edit summary) that an article can't have both {{refimprove}} and {{notability}} tags. The shortcomings that the two tags flag can easily coexist. I might doubt the notability of a subject, even if I believe the subject exists. But suppose the article makes a lot of strong statements that are a bit suspicious and that really call for in-article references for support. I'm going to tag it for notability and also for improved referencing. —Largo Plazo (talk) 17:37, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
Nomination of Bijoux 22 for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bijoux 22 is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Bijoux 22 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Logical Cowboy (talk) 11:33, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Nomination of Impulcity for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Impulcity is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Impulcity until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Logical Cowboy (talk) 11:42, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Forte Sounds
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Forte Sounds requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Logical Cowboy (talk) 13:23, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
March 2015
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Misplaced Pages for soapboxing, promotion or advertising. The extent of your promotional editing is truly massive. Here are some of the warnings you deleted from your talk page. . Also, it is really obvious that several of your articles were commissioned on an external website for pay, by Bikiniluxeswim, Forexearly, etc. Logical Cowboy (talk) 13:47, 14 March 2015 (UTC)