This is an old revision of this page, as edited by The Anome (talk | contribs) at 21:31, 14 March 2015 (→Enough: as is the wording of the unblock request itself.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 21:31, 14 March 2015 by The Anome (talk | contribs) (→Enough: as is the wording of the unblock request itself.)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Welcome!
Hello, Wowee Zowee public, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to World AIDS Day. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
- Introduction and Getting started
- Contributing to Misplaced Pages
- The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome! Drmies (talk) 18:35, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
Delta Airlines Flight 1086
The better the shape the article is in, the easier it is to show that WP:GNG is met. Have a look at the Villa Castelli helicopter crash article and you will see that there is an infobox and the article has a defined structure. Bare urls are not good either. {{infobox aircraft occurrence}} is the infobox template. {{cite web}} is the template to cite websites. Use <ref name=xxxx>{{cite web |url= |title= |publisher= |accessdate=}}</ref> at minimum (you can copy and paste this). Other parameters may be added as required. Mjroots (talk) 20:52, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
STOP
Coffee, for 48 hours, do not make any edits on my user talk page without asking me first. Thank you. Do not constantly revert. Thank you. Your cooperation will be helpful in calming a situation. Wowee Zowee public (talk) 20:03, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
- Per WP:OWNTALK, "users may freely remove comments from their own talk pages". There are a few exceptions, but I don't see anything you removed as being covered by those exceptions. Feel free to remove entries from your own talk page. If anyone wants to see what's been posted there previously, they need only check the history. Best regards, JoeSperrazza (talk) 20:53, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
- Thank you. You, Joe, are reasonable and do things to calm a situation. I, too, am trying to calm a situation. Wowee Zowee public (talk) 20:59, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Advice
You are in a hole. I suggest that you stop digging. Digging causes the hole to get deeper. Robert McClenon (talk) 20:32, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
- Yes, I know. I just realized that Coffee was baiting me. He/she wanted an excuse to block me again or have someone do it for him. See how mean some admins are?! Wowee Zowee public (talk) 20:34, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
- I'm afraid that's just more of the same behavior you're being warned about, WZP. Please put down the WP:STICK, and step away from the conflict, or you are likely to be on the receiving end of a WP:BOOMERANG. Perhaps you should take a short break from editing, and see if you can disengage yourself from this. -- The Anome (talk) 20:51, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
Enough
You can't possibly have the opinions you claim you have, so I have no choice but to assume you're just trying to stir up trouble. We have quite enough trouble here already, thank you, we don't need more. --Floquenbeam (talk) 20:55, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Floquenbeam (talk) 20:55, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
Wowee Zowee public (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I have already said sorry and mentioned disengagement, so blocking is not warranted. See my last few comments proving that I am disengaging. The act of blocking is actually a move than incites more drama and warfare, not less. In fact, I mentioned to Ponyo on my final edit that I would step back for a few hours then correct an error upon return. See this shows correct and productive Wikipedian thinking! A final note. The duration of my block is permanent. That is the Misplaced Pages equivalent of the death penalty. Please do not murder me Misplaced Pages style. Unblocking now is called for but changing it it 15 hours is ok ....... https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User_talk:Ponyo&diff=prev&oldid=651383318 https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User_talk:Cassianto&diff=prev&oldid=651382923 https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=prev&oldid=651382567 https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=prev&oldid=651382230 https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User_talk:Robert_McClenon&diff=prev&oldid=651382023 https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User_talk:Wowee_Zowee_public&diff=prev&oldid=651381707
Decline reason:
I've read your last comment to Ponyo: as far as I can see, it does not look like you are stepping away, but instead appears to be yet another gambit to keep the drama going; as is the wording of the unblock request itself. You are welcome to appeal again, but I suggest you should take some time to read -- and understand -- the unblocking appeal guidelines first before doing so. -- The Anome (talk) 21:25, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.