Misplaced Pages

Criticism of communism

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by BG19bot (talk | contribs) at 06:45, 17 March 2015 (WP:CHECKWIKI error fix for #52. Do general fixes if a problem exists. - using AWB (10839)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 06:45, 17 March 2015 by BG19bot (talk | contribs) (WP:CHECKWIKI error fix for #52. Do general fixes if a problem exists. - using AWB (10839))(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Part of a series on
Communism
Concepts
Economics
Variants
History
Organisations
People
By region
Symbols
Criticism
Related topics
Communism portal
icon Socialism portal

Criticism of communism can be divided into two broad categories: those concerning themselves with the practical aspects of 20th century Communist states, and those concerning themselves with communist principles and theory. These two categories usually overlap because criticisms of the theory are usually supported by several 20th century examples. And most people who criticize communism are against both communist principles and policies.

Anti-communists typically argue that communist theory is directly responsible for the problems of 20th century "communism". communists typically argue that the theory is deeper than the practice. Therefore anti-communists tend to produce criticisms that connect theory and practice, while communists respond by dividing these criticisms into separate arguments about theory and practice.

However, one may agree with communist principles but disagree with many policies adopted by Communist states (this is quite common among Trotskyists), or, more rarely, agree with policies adopted by Communist states but disagree with communist principles.

The categories of criticisms mentioned above are discussed in separate articles:

Regarding East Germany (GDR), German historian Jürgen Kocka in 2010 summarized the consensus of scholars:

"Conceptualizing the GDR as a dictatorship has become widely accepted, while the meaning of the concept dictatorship varies. Massive evidence has been collected that proves the repressive, undemocratic, illiberal, nonpluralistic character of the GDR regime and its ruling party."

Further reading

  • Bosteels, Bruno. The actuality of communism (Verso Books, 2014)
  • Blackmer, Donald LM, and Sidney Tarrow, eds. Communism in Italy and France (Princeton University Press, 2015)
  • Priestland, David. The Red Flag: A History of Communism (Grove Press, 2009)
  • Resnick, Stephen A., and Richard D. Wolff. Class theory and history: Capitalism and communism in the USSR (Routledge, 2013)
  • Taras, Raymond C. The Road to Disillusion: From Critical Marxism to Post-communism in Eastern Europe (Routledge, 2015)

See also

Notes

  1. Bruno Bosteels, The actuality of communism (Verso Books, 2014)
  2. Raymond C. Taras, The Road to Disillusion: From Critical Marxism to Post-communism in Eastern Europe (Routledge, 2015).
  3. Jürgen Kocka, ed. (2010). Civil Society & Dictatorship in Modern German History. UPNE. p. 37. {{cite book}}: |author= has generic name (help)
Categories: