Misplaced Pages

User:NewsAndEventsGuy/sandbox

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< User:NewsAndEventsGuy

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by NewsAndEventsGuy (talk | contribs) at 13:19, 28 March 2015 (more). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 13:19, 28 March 2015 by NewsAndEventsGuy (talk | contribs) (more)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
This is the user sandbox of NewsAndEventsGuy. A user sandbox is a subpage of the user's user page. It serves as a testing spot and page development space for the user and is not an encyclopedia article. Create or edit your own sandbox here.

Other sandboxes: Main sandbox | Template sandbox


Finished writing a draft article? Are you ready to request review of it by an experienced editor for possible inclusion in Misplaced Pages? Submit your draft for review!


more

*For grey box with text, the text goes here
  • User_talk:Adjwilley#Possible_sock

please suggest some draft text, with ] to what ]. @@ without suggesting any specific improvements amounts to a general discussion and this is not a forum for general topic discussion

For speedy deletion of linkfarm talk pages {{db-g5|Arthur Rubin/IP list}}

TODO: https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User_talk:Quiddity&diff=640128313&oldid=640119055

WP:RFO

For new editors... although the poll sort of looks like a vote that is not what it is. Misplaced Pages treats polls such as these as a way of organizing discussion of the principles and the strength of the reasons underlying editors' viewpoints. It is not a majority rule voting process. As it says in WP:Consensus "...consensus is determined by the quality of arguments (not by a simple counted majority), polls should be regarded as structured discussions rather than voting. Responses indicating individual explanations of positions using Misplaced Pages policies and guidelines are given the highest weight."

Do not edit war

Once you have been reverted, you are expected to discuss the matter at the article talk page. One of the reverting editors has already started a thread for that purpose. Please click this link and discuss the improvements you think need to be made, instead of repeatedly editing the article, because that looks a lot like edit warring, which can lead to sanctions.

Great, now learn how to use a talk page

Thanks for replying at article talk. Next, please learn how to discuss at those talk (or this) talk page. Three things

  • Sign your posts by typing 4 tildes at the end. Like this ~~~~
  • Learn to indent to show who you are replying to, using colons Like this : or :::: etc
  • Read the talk page guidelines


Before any more editing, please review about ]. The next step is to DISCUSS at the article talk page, where we have ]. If you are unhappy with the discussion, don't keep restoring the reverted text or variations of it. Instead, rely on ] ~~~~




"The magnitude of climate change and the severity of its impacts will depend on the actions that human societies take to respond to these risks." pg 2 America's Climate Choices: Advancing the Science of Climate Change (Report in Brief) Matson, et al US National Research Council 2010 http://dels.nas.edu/resources/static-assets/materials-based-on-reports/reports-in-brief/Science-Report-Brief-final.pdf

Before Global warming lead revamp reconfirm scope of article

section Moved to sandbox3

table formatting

Header text Header text Header text
R1C1 R1C2 R1C3
R2C2 R2C3
R3C1 R3C2 R3C3