Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license.
Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat.
We can research this topic together.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Yemen, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Yemen on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YemenWikipedia:WikiProject YemenTemplate:WikiProject YemenYemen
A news item involving March 2015 Sanaa mosque bombings was featured on Misplaced Pages's Main Page in the In the news section on 21 March 2015.
Info removed on charges of undue weight and unreliable source
An info I had added about a Houthi official's claim of evidence about US involvement in the Sana'a mosque bombing was removed. Reasons cited was giving "undue weight" and using "unreliable source." But I think the charge of undue weight is completely irrelevant and nonsense for how can citing a Houthi official about bombings against Houthi supporters bear undue weight in an article about exactly that incident?
Though, as for the charge that the source used was unreliable I'm looking forward to see why Fars News Agency is deemed unreliable. What is certain is that the agency is a respected and popular news source at least in Iran. Strivingsoul (talk) 22:19, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
Iran does not have press freedom, and Fars is a government mouthpiece that shouldn't be considered a reliable news source. The contention that the U.S. is somehow in league with al Qaeda is WP:FRINGE and such a claim should absolutely not be presented with such thin sourcing. Furthermore, the addition smacks of WP:COATRACKing, which is discouraged. And beyond that, your edit wasn't even remotely WP:NPOV: "the popular Ansarullah movement"? "Spy agencies"? Please take some time to review Misplaced Pages's policy guidelines, including WP:COI. -Kudzu1 (talk) 22:46, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
"Iran does not have press freedom" According to whom? I'd argue Iran has the most press freedom in the world! That there are a few journalists convicted for breach of law or working for foreign intelligence services every some time does not undermine press freedom.
As for Houthis being "popular," that's supported by the fact the they literally control half of Yemen and have managed to mobilize massive rallies in the past and present. Example!Strivingsoul (talk) 00:25, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
Yikes. I'm not sure where to start with this, so I'm not going to start at all. Suffice to say you do not have consensus for the paragraph for the reasons I have articulated above, and I suggest you branch out from Iranian media to get your information about the world. -Kudzu1 (talk) 00:42, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
You are not telling us, @Monochrome Monitor, that we should censor the sources based on your personal preference, are you? Strivingsoul (talk) 05:00, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
It's not my personal preference, its wiki policy. Press Tv is a state-run propaganda organ of Iran (which regularly produces racist diatribes against Jews and other minorities I might add), therefore it is not a reliable source. --Monochrome_Monitor08:34, 29 March 2015 (UTC)