Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Lowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs) at 06:22, 10 April 2015 (Archiving 2 discussion(s) to User talk:Callanecc/Archive 18) (bot). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Callanecc is busy and may not respond swiftly to queries.

User talk:Callanecc/Header

AE question

Hi, I'm not to familiar with the Pakistan/India arbitration regime. Am I correct that there is no general 1RR restriction there? Reply here is ok. Thanks. Zero 11:01, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

That's correct, it's just normal discretionary sanctions (but which have been enforced pretty vigorously in the past). From memory only Israel/Pakistan has a general 1RR at the moment. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 11:20, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

Israel/Palestine? OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 11:41, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

Sorry Arab-Israeli. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 12:27, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

My experience is that the 1RR was a great thing for the Arab-Israeli section. It doesn't stop edit-warring, but it makes people pause before reverting again. It also helps to get rid of fly-by-night political activists. I suspect that a similar restriction on the Pakistan/India area would be good there too, though it ought to be discussed more widely first. How would you feel about imposing it now on a few articles, such as the BJP article? Zero 05:18, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

It's a good idea in principle, but I don't think they'd be consensus (not that that's technically needed) for imposing it generally across the whole topic. That said it can be really helpful if placed on a case by case basis.

I'm not sure it would have too much effect on Bharatiya Janata Party. Editors there seems to have gone back to discussing. Added to that the conflicts seems to be drawn out so 1RR wouldn't be too effective.

What do you think? Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:29, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

In my opinion it will be useful. Vanamonde always revert first and then discusses. If Calypso or someone adds something he doesn't like, it is reverted (multiple times) and the other is forced to go to talk page, and if something he adds is removed it is placed repeatedly and again the other person is forced to go to talk page. 1RR will restrict his ownership. --AmritasyaPutra 04:01, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

AP would like to make it seem like I'm the only one who reverts frequently, when I have never been blocked for edit-warring in the topic area, and he has, twice. I'm also fairly certain that this is not the venue for discussing my behavior, unless of course Callanecc wants to. Vanamonde93 (talk) 04:21, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

No, this is not the place, if evidence is asked I can easily give more than three cases of you reverting more than three times. You get away because it is usually a new editor and doesn't even know the rules. You had baited me on both occasions along with your buddy, I was inexperienced. You have been blocked for edit war too. Anyway think this: if that's not your nature then you have nothing to worry if 1RR is imposed, right? --AmritasyaPutra 06:11, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

Undeletion Igor Radusinovic

He was plays in the Indonesia Super League see soccerway, in history — Preceding unsigned comment added by 112.215.64.223 (talk) 04:54, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

Hi 112.215.64.223, I'd rather not undelete it at this stage. Instead could you please submit a WP:Deletion review. Regards, Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:24, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

You've got mail!

Kharkiv07 15:57, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

A pie for you!

Happy Easter! Scalhotrod (Talk) ☮ღ☺ 17:02, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Misplaced Pages talk:Medical disclaimer

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Misplaced Pages talk:Medical disclaimer. Legobot (talk) 00:07, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

Violation?

Greetings Callanecc. Worm is not online for nearly 5 days. Thus I would like to know from you if the creation of this SPI was any violation of my restriction. Although I don't consider it as violation because I hadn't referred to the particular article anywhere, and only named the editors who have contributed there. If I am correct, can I also refer to this filing over there? Thank you. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 00:20, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

OccultZone, this being the third time you've tried to find a way to connect these accounts, it appears that you're just throwing things at the wall, hoping for something to stick. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 00:50, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

Let me make this crystal clear, you need to step away from these editors! If you continue accusing them of sockpuppetry it is likely to be consider harassment. You need to step away from this topic area and from these editors (and those you think are related to them) right now. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:16, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

I think I would rather wait for him, or just make an appeal. Thanks anyway. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 06:19, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

No I'm saying stop or you're risking being blocked for harassment. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:25, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

Don't worry I will be back here and do nothing until you allow. That would be fine? OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 06:31, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

No, just drop it completely. If there is something to be found, let someone else deal with it and don't get involved. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 07:03, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

I have to agree with Callanecc, and it occurs to me, OccultZone, that I did warn you that further accusations of sockpuppetry against these users would be considered to be personal attacks. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 12:35, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

I assure both of you, that I have taken everything in account that has been said above. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 12:49, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

Tech News: 2015-15

Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.

Recent changes

• You can join a new email list for important news about Wikimedia Labs.
• You can read the last monthly report. In the future you can read team reports every three months. You can see current work on the roadmap.
• The number of articles in Special:Statistics is now updated once a month.
• You can use a new version of the Misplaced Pages app for Android. Using the app, you can now share a fact with your friends.

Problems

• The import tool was broken for a few days. Imports didn't add log entries. You can delete and import pages again if necessary.
• Labs was broken several times this week.

Changes this week

• The new version of MediaWiki has been on test wikis and MediaWiki.org since April 1. It will be on non-Misplaced Pages wikis from April 7. It will be on all Wikipedias from April 8 (calendar).
• You can now add the same special characters with VisualEditor as with the wikitext editor.
• Many bugs around copy-paste in VisualEditor are now fixed.
• You can now use basic tools of VisualEditor in the new talk tool. You can add links, bold and italics. You can also mention people.

Meetings

• You can join the next weekly meeting with the Editing team. During the meetings you can tell developers which bugs are the most important. The meeting will be on April 8 at 18:00 (UTC). See how to join.

Future changes

• You can again comment on how you want to see Wikidata edits in your watchlist on other wikis.

Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.

15:41, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

Igor Radusinovic

Hi Callanecc, I want to ask you kindly to restore the article Igor Radusinovic since now he have played in Indonesia Super League, thus making him notable. Source here. Cheers! MbahGondrong (talk) 00:08, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

Hi MbahGondrong, I'd rather not undelete myself it at this stage. Instead could you please submit a WP:Deletion review. Regards, Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 00:25, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

I have made a WP:UNDELETE instead, here. MbahGondrong (talk) 00:38, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

Re: Page protection

Can you please impose semi-protection on Little India (location)? You had blocked Basdrhnrnz who was the biggest contributor of this article in terms of adding more bytes to it. Now he seems to be restoring to his version through IPs. Content is copyvio, and these edits are disruptive at best. I had already requested this at RFPP, but they really don't understand. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 02:29, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

AE Archiving

Callannecc, the bot keeps archiving the AE section I opened. I've reverted it twice; any more, and I'm beginning to look incredibly pushy. Even if that thing is to be closed no action, could you please formally close it, so that I know I can move on? Regards, Vanamonde93 (talk) 20:31, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

Aaron Schock

Lower to pending changes? This person already resigned as a district representative. Also, people might cool down for a while. --George Ho (talk) 05:22, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

It's still pretty controversial as far as I can tell so I'd rather leave it semi protected for now at least. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 09:55, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

20 March?

You mean 20 March 2016 or 20 April of this year? OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 10:29, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

Arbitration case request clarification closed

Hi Callanecc, the Arbitration Committee has closed the Clarification request: Article titles and capitalisation, which you were listed as a party to. For the Arbitration Committee, -- Liz 19:55, 9 April 2015 (UTC)