This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Erpert (talk | contribs) at 07:45, 13 April 2015 (→AN: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 07:45, 13 April 2015 by Erpert (talk | contribs) (→AN: new section)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
|
Click here to leave a new message. |
 Archives |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 15 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 1 section is present. |
You've got mail!
Message added 05:12, 3 April 2015 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
Nikkimaria (talk) 05:12, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
User has moved article contrary your RM close
- 18:44, 4 April 2015 Erpert moved page Taylor Hayes (pornographic actress) to Taylor Hayes (actress)
- 09:26, 19 March 2015 Erpert moved page Taylor Hayes (pornographic actress) to Taylor Hayes (actress)
- 22:43, 15 March 2015 Erpert moved page Taylor Hayes (pornographic actress) to Taylor Hayes (actress)
You just closed a RM Talk:Taylor Hayes (pornographic actress) with no consensus, but it has been moved again. Additionally the same User:Erpert appears to be tag-teaming on the subject of removing "pornographic" which is the stable disambiguator in the Category:American female pornographic film actors with another user User:Scalhotrod at Talk:April O'Neil (pornographic actress) and has just made a non-admin close there which evidently fails the consensus criteria for a non-admin close. Additionally I note that there is a male actor of the same name in a minor role in a film article. In ictu oculi (talk) 07:13, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
- (edit conflict) (talk page stalker) To clarify, I am not tag-teaming with Scalhotrod (or anyone else, for that matter). The RM you are referring to was a suggestion from Scalhotrod to move Taylor Hayes (pornographic actress) to simply Taylor Hayes, which, if you noticed, I actually opposed. What I did do was move the article to Taylor Hayes (actress) because of the outcome of this similar discussion, which perhaps Number 57 didn't see. (I also don't see how the male actor Taylor Hayes even applies here, as he doesn't have an article.) Erpert 07:23, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
- I added more discussion on the Porn Project Talk page, I didn't know about any of this, but I'm fine with it based on the outcome of the Aja article. --Scalhotrod (Talk) ☮ღ☺ 09:25, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
- Number 57 I've put in a technical move to restore to RM result. In ictu oculi (talk) 19:10, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
UK Local Election Templates
Hi #57. For info, I think the only template that is missing is the one for Surrey. If you have the time, I'd appreciate if you could create it. Thanks. Lugnuts 13:47, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
- Hi Lugnuts. Yes, it's on my to-do list, alongside Warwickshire and Tyne & Wear. Cheers, Number 57 20:32, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
- PS - can I ask that when you create election categories, you also tag them with {{WikiProject Elections and Referendums}}? And also remember to add the main articles to them (e.g. Forest Heath District Council elections wasn't added to Category:Forest Heath District Council elections. Cheers, Number 57 20:46, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
- Yes, will do - thanks for the heads-up. Lugnuts 06:48, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
AN
This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is "WP:PRECISE and pornographic film actresses". Thank you. (This thread is not a complaint against you; I'm just trying to straighten something out.) Erpert 07:45, 13 April 2015 (UTC)