This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk | contribs) at 12:54, 9 May 2015 (You have been indefinitely blocked from editing. (TW)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 12:54, 9 May 2015 by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk | contribs) (You have been indefinitely blocked from editing. (TW))(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Thanks for your appreciation on Sarasvati river
Dear Eshwar.om, I tried to do what I felt most appropriate, at the best of my knowledge. You can have a better understanding of my points if you look at my much detailed explanatory discussion on the Sarasvati river with some of the experienced editors @User talk:Kautilya3 under the section titled "Saraswati and myth-making" .
Best regards. --BodduLokesh (talk) 13:39, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
Chera dynasty
You are still messing around with images at Chera dynasty despite umpteen people noting at WP:ANI that this aspect of your work is one of the many where you display signs of lacking competence. So, stop and discuss rather than edit war, please. Handing out a few barnstars etc to people who have criticised your efforts is not a get out of jail card. - Sitush (talk) 05:00, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
- And your restoration of gibberish at Valmiki was no better. - Sitush (talk) 05:02, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
- The pen is mightier than the sword,so please could you explain why those images should not present in Chera dynasty?! When in Rome, do as the Romans,(Handing out a few barnstars etc to people).got it?Eshwar.om 05:18, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
When the going gets tough, the tough get going.".i believe on that.Eshwar.om 05:28, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
Administrator advice
@Eshwar.om: I'm concerned that you don't appear to be heeding the guidance you have been given at WP:ANI and elsewhere to avoid disruption to the Encyclopedia. Editing here is a privilege, not a right and if you do not work cooperatively with other editors, your editing rights will be suspended or removed as someone who is not here to build an encyclopedia. Thank you for your attention. Philg88 05:32, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
- Thank youEshwar.om 05:48, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
Eshwar.om, as you are aware (notification diff), India articles are subject to arbcom discretionary sanctions. If you continue to edit disruptively, you will find yourself banned from editing any articles related to India. You should heed Philg88's advice above and edit very carefully from now on. --regentspark (comment) 11:37, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
yes i am aware of that.thanksEshwar.om 12:14, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
A request
Dear i have certain points that i would like to share relating to tamil & sanskrit.
May i know the languages known to you? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.236.255.113 (talk) 07:49, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
the thing is basically i m from japan.but yes i know this two languages.i am not well scholar .but i m ok with that.Eshwar.om 09:01, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
May 2015
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for a long-term pattern of uncooperative editing and lack of necessary editing and language skills. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Fut.Perf. ☼ 12:54, 9 May 2015 (UTC)