This is an old revision of this page, as edited by BeastBoy3395 (talk | contribs) at 04:38, 13 May 2015. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 04:38, 13 May 2015 by BeastBoy3395 (talk | contribs)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Welcome!
|
BeastBoy3395, you are invited to the Teahouse!
Hi BeastBoy3395! Thanks for contributing to Misplaced Pages. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Misplaced Pages and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Rosiestep (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the TeahouseThis message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:31, 9 May 2015 (UTC) |
May 2015
Your recent editing history at Rape jihad shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. —C.Fred (talk) 03:27, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
- Comment: @C.Fred: While BeastBoy has pushed the limit with four reverts in a 24hr period, I will defend him in noting that one of those was to rescind a vandalistic edit that another editor had restored. (@BeastBoy3395: Please keep an eye on the clock, my fellow man!) Pax 06:36, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Apologies?
Awfully sorry if I jumped the gun, I'm a bit disoriented right now. I'll go to sleep and if I was indeed correct (as I suspect I am) I'll get back to you then.Bosstopher (talk) 03:28, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
- Thank you. I will see you tomorrow. BeastBoy3395 (talk) 03:28, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
- Really sorry. Looking over it now it's clear you were right.Bosstopher (talk) 10:57, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
You are not allowed to remove an AfD flag
The debate is just starting. Please leave it. Thank you. Carrite (talk) 17:50, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
ARBIPA notification
This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Misplaced Pages. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.Please read and follow any policies that you are referred to by experienced editors. Failure to do so may invite sanctions. All the best! - Kautilya3 (talk) 18:37, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Edit warring May 2015
Your recent editing history at Love Jihad shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. You can be blocked for violating WP:3RR. --Fauzan✉ mail 18:42, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Discussion at WP:AN/I
There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is BeastBoy3395 misrepresenting sources. Thank you. Huon (talk) 21:50, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
May 2015
Don't remove other users' comments as you did at ANI or you will be blocked. bishzilla ROARR!! 21:58, 10 May 2015 (UTC).
- I removed no one's comments. ? BeastBoy3395 (talk) 22:00, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
- It looks like it happened innocently, probably the result of an edit conflict, but you did delete a comment left by User:Beyond My Ken in another thread. —C.Fred (talk) 22:01, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
- It was definitely by accident. I was putting a comment, and out of nowhere Beyond Ken's got removed. Don't know how that happened. BeastBoy3395 (talk) 22:03, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
- Yes, I'm sure it was an accident, or indeed the notorious "ANI bug". Don't worry about it, BeastBoy. Bishonen | talk 22:05, 10 May 2015 (UTC).
- It was definitely by accident. I was putting a comment, and out of nowhere Beyond Ken's got removed. Don't know how that happened. BeastBoy3395 (talk) 22:03, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
- It looks like it happened innocently, probably the result of an edit conflict, but you did delete a comment left by User:Beyond My Ken in another thread. —C.Fred (talk) 22:01, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
- I'm serious. BeastBoy3395 (talk) 22:06, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
- We agree that it was an accident. I've done it myself, especially on high-traffic pages like ANI. —C.Fred (talk) 22:09, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
- ? I'm serious too. The ANI bug exists. Bishonen | talk 22:10, 10 May 2015 (UTC).
Reference errors on 10 May
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the Lisa Murkowski page, your edit caused an unsupported parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:24, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
May 2015
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring, disruptive editing, as you did at Rape jihad. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Drmies (talk) 02:14, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.
BeastBoy3395 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I sincerely apologize for edit warring at Rape jihad, and I promise I won't do it again if unblocked. I only did it because I was angry that material I liked was being reverted and I thought I was justified; nevertheless, it was wrong, I shouldn't have done it, and I now know what I did was wrong. If you ubnlock me, I'm willing to submit to a 1 week restriction from editing the Rape jihad article, and I'm also willing to submit to a promise that I won't revert another user's edits unless it's obviously vandalism, or unless I have consensus to do so. Thank you. BeastBoy3395 (talk) 02:20, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
Accept reason:
Block has expired. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 18:43, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
You are not blocked anymore. Zeke Essiestudy (talk) 16:10, 12 May 2015 (UTC)