Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/1361 Leuschneria - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by David Eppstein (talk | contribs) at 07:15, 15 May 2015 (1361 Leuschneria: another). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 07:15, 15 May 2015 by David Eppstein (talk | contribs) (1361 Leuschneria: another)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

1361 Leuschneria

1361 Leuschneria (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

DOesn't meet WP:NASTRO or WP:GNG. Should be deleted; or (preferably) redirected to List of minor planets: 1001–2000 per NASTRO. Boleyn (talk) 19:41, 14 May 2015 (UTC) Boleyn (talk) 19:41, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. North America 23:15, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Unsure. The main subject of two old orbital studies , used as one of two examples in a paper about a method for calculating orbits , and mentioned more recently as a candidate for a certain orbital resonance (but found not to be in that resonance) . This last reference also cites a book chapter by Williams (1979) where its candidacy for the resonance was first proposed. Is it enough? —David Eppstein (talk) 07:12, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
Categories: