This is an old revision of this page, as edited by GregJackP (talk | contribs) at 02:35, 17 May 2015 (→edit warring). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 02:35, 17 May 2015 by GregJackP (talk | contribs) (→edit warring)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
| This is GregJackP's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14Auto-archiving period: 7 days  |
 Archives | ||||||||||||||
Index
|
||||||||||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Please add new posts at the bottom of the page.
Nomination of Robert H. Richards IV for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Robert H. Richards IV is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Robert H. Richards IV until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. - Cwobeel (talk) 04:56, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
MOSLAW
I've decided not to go forward with proposing this edit, mainly because after looking at the What links here? for article talk pages to MOSLAW I see that it's almost never cited for the proposition I was trying to clarify. In fact, I could only find one instance of that and, well, you did it. (And as such was an error only an Aggie would make — to which let me add, as a further friendly jab by yer' friendly neighborhood Tea Sip: "Hook 'em.") As such, I've come to think that my proposal is a solution looking for a problem and was to some extent, rule creep. All collegiate posturing aside, it would appear that you and I have a lot in common and I look forward to working with you in the future. (Have you ever considered doing content dispute resolution? I work at 3O, DRN, and am a member of the Mediation Committee and you have the kind of background which might suit you for that kind of work.) Best regards, TransporterMan (TALK) 15:42, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks for your kind words, but I am really not the guy you want at 3O or DRM. I've been Arbcom sitebanned and topic banned, plus I've retired in a snit a couple of times. I can be, at times, rather blunt and well, less than tactful. I do look forward to working with you though, and agree that we have a lot in common. (PS, the collegiate posturing may be worse than you think, I'm also a Sooner in addition to being a grad of Aggie Law, :) ). GregJackP Boomer! 16:14, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
- I have friends who are Aggies and others who are Sooners, but you may be my first who is both. Sheesh. Nonetheless, I'm looking forward to seeing you around the Wiki. Best regards, TransporterMan (TALK) 16:46, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
- Heh, I have degrees from both Montana State University and the University of Montana - which is probably why I never attend ballgames for the cross state rivalry! Montanabw 05:50, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
- I have friends who are Aggies and others who are Sooners, but you may be my first who is both. Sheesh. Nonetheless, I'm looking forward to seeing you around the Wiki. Best regards, TransporterMan (TALK) 16:46, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
A food award
|
All-American meal |
| To fuel your continued editing of Misplaced Pages, and to thank you for honorably serving in uniform the United States, I hereby present to you this meal. Enjoy! RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 05:40, 13 May 2015 (UTC) |
RfC: Guidance on commas after Jr. and Sr.
Following the closure of a recent RfC you participated in, I have started an RfC on the separate but related issue of commas after Jr. and Sr.. Please see Misplaced Pages:Village pump (policy) § RfC: Guidance on commas after Jr. and Sr. and feel free to comment there. Thanks! —sroc 💬 06:03, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
edit warring
- You don't get to unilaterally remove content and dictate terms. It is WP:BRD. You boldly removed content. I reverted. Now we discuss it on both talk pages. Please stop acting like a wiki-dictator and understand that you have to obtain consensus to make a change. Especially when the article has passed a GA review and was promoted. Until you get consensus, the material stays in, per wiki policies. Your arrogant approach may work in MedRS articles, but it won't work here. GregJackP Boomer! 02:11, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
- I await your response at Talk:Bad Elk v. United States. You have added unsourced content to the article. Thanks. Jytdog (talk) 02:14, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
- The material was sourced. Do you need me to explain it to you in simple terms, or is this just your way of being obtuse? GregJackP Boomer! 02:20, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
- really, I am looking for an answer there. Jytdog (talk) 02:34, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
- Stay off my talkpage. GregJackP Boomer! 02:35, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
- really, I am looking for an answer there. Jytdog (talk) 02:34, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
GAR
Bad Elk v. United States, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Jytdog (talk) 02:27, 17 May 2015 (UTC)