This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Epeefleche (talk | contribs) at 01:45, 2 July 2015 (→Citations in lede: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 01:45, 2 July 2015 by Epeefleche (talk | contribs) (→Citations in lede: new section)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)This is Pburka's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6Auto-archiving period: 31 days |
Citations in lede
As a general rule, because the lead will usually repeat information that is in the body, editors should balance the desire to avoid redundant citations in the lead with the desire to aid readers in locating sources for challengeable material. Where the ref is in the body of the text, I don't see a need -- especially where the subject is not a living person. I don't think the NW article required citations in the lede, as they were clearly in the body, and agree with the editor who removed your c-needed tag. --Epeefleche (talk) 01:45, 2 July 2015 (UTC)