User talk:Redfoxjump - Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by BlackRanger88 (talk | contribs) at 06:30, 2 July 2015. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 06:30, 2 July 2015 by BlackRanger88 (talk | contribs)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Welcome to Misplaced Pages. At least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Misplaced Pages, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. BlackRanger88 (talk) 00:32, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Misplaced Pages. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Misplaced Pages's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Misplaced Pages's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. BlackRanger88 (talk) 16:41, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Misplaced Pages's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Misplaced Pages's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. BlackRanger88 (talk) 00:05, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Misplaced Pages. BlackRanger88 (talk) 16:19, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

I did not vandalize. Please stop the slander. Redfoxjump (talk) 08:12, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

Yes, but you did edit in a disruptive manner. On the Japanese invasions of Korea (1592-1598) page, you continued to delete sourced information despite my many attempts at civil discussion. You undid edits making outrageous claims such as, "disruption is clearly wrong" even though the sources I provided explicitly stated otherwise. Then you attempted to add diction that was not from a neutral point of view despite the fact that it directly contrasted with the sources I provided. Finally, you made an irrelevant request to "show the number of all of Japanese supply ships" even though the source I provided sourced the diction I used. Each of these times, you hastily undid the edits without proper reasoning or consideration for other editors, and for the recent edits, you didn't even bother to try and discuss the issue on the talk page. BlackRanger88 (talk) 16:34, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

Please Discuss First

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Misplaced Pages.

Discuss any issues you have with the wording on the talk page BEFORE editing. I made this request very clear now. Honestly, I don't want to have to get administrators involved and make this a bigger issue than it needs to be, so let's civilly discuss the matter on the talk page until we can arrive at some sort of an agreement. I've made a new specific talk page section where we, and other concerned editors, can address any issues we have with the current wording in the infobox. BlackRanger88 (talk) 22:33, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring. Thank you. BlackRanger88 (talk) 19:04, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Misplaced Pages. When you add content to talk pages and Misplaced Pages pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 12:38, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

May 2015

Hello, I'm Amaury. Misplaced Pages is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Japanese invasions of Korea (1592–98) seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Amaury (talk) 08:04, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Sorry

sorry I accidently rollbacked one of your edits,and have rollbacked myself to your last edit. This was in no way because of yourvcedit, or an indication of that I wish to participate in your edit sparring. I was wanting to see the differences between diffs, and accidentlybhit roll back, trying tovedit with fat fingers on a mobile device.--KTo288 (talk) 13:06, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Edit warring at Japanese invasions of Korea (1592–98)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

The full report is at WP:AN3#User:Redfoxjump reported by User:BlackRanger88 (Result: Blocked). Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 04:57, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

I noticed that many other editors have accused you for vandalism but I'm pretty sure that wasn't your intention. Maybe you've made some mistakes however I believe your motive is to improve Misplaced Pages. Well everybody makes mistakes. Just do not make the same mistake twice. Cheers!

Chamith (talk) 11:48, 1 July 2015 (UTC)