This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Mais oui! (talk | contribs) at 09:25, 2 August 2006 ({{BioWikiProject|class=FA|importance=Mid|needs-infobox=yes}}). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 09:25, 2 August 2006 by Mais oui! (talk | contribs) ({{BioWikiProject|class=FA|importance=Mid|needs-infobox=yes}})(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Template:Featured article is only for Misplaced Pages:Featured articles. Template:WPCD-People Template:BioWikiProject Template:Mainpage date Just read the article... its brilliant!
DiamondVertex 07:32, 5 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Nice to know you think so. Thanks Giano 09:04, 5 Mar 2005 (UTC)
I also find it well-written and illuminating. One thing that could improve it: colour, up-to-date photographs of the man's works. That's my only suggestion to boost this excellent article. Radagast 04:22, Mar 19, 2005 (UTC)
- Thanks for your kind words, regarding the images when I started to write this I would have agreed with you, I only used the Victorian black and white photographs as they were the only ones I could find out of copyright. Having now stared at them for the three weeks or so I was writing this, I now think they add a certain nostalgia and originality to the page, they also have a certain clean clarity that new ones may not have, especially as many of the buildings are now in heavily developed areas. However I suppose this is a modern encyclopedia, and that is not a very encyclopedic view, and colour would brighten the page up, but in the meantime I quite like the old ones. Giano 15:22, 19 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Yes, it's true that the monochrome imagery adds something of a general theme to the article; however, I like to appreciate all aspects of a structure when it comes to architecture, and a crisp colour image or two would make a lot of difference, IMO. Radagast 17:13, Mar 19, 2005 (UTC)