This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Conifer (talk | contribs) at 05:28, 12 August 2015 (→Explanation of notability: reply). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 05:28, 12 August 2015 by Conifer (talk | contribs) (→Explanation of notability: reply)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Deletion discussion about FreeWorldGroup
Hello, Flobberz,
I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether FreeWorldGroup should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/FreeWorldGroup .
If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
Thanks, Conifer (talk) 05:01, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
Explanation of notability
To include an article about a company on Misplaced Pages, there have to be multiple reliable, independent sources that have written about the company. That means newspaper articles or books. LinkedIn doesn't qualify because except in rare circumstances, social media websites are not reliable sources, and neither that nor references written by the owner are independent of the company. Conifer (talk) 05:24, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
There aren't any. What do you want from me? I can't just majiik up some news articles for you mate I'm not Jesus. --Flobberz (talk) 05:27, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
- So then it's not suitable for inclusion. Conifer (talk) 05:28, 12 August 2015 (UTC)