Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Signedzzz (talk | contribs) at 18:19, 27 September 2015 (→"Positive" Reception: r). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Television C‑class Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Misplaced Pages articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision C This article has been rated as C-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

"Positive" Reception

It reads contradictory to say that the show received positive reviews from critics, but then follow it (almost exclusively) with derisive quotes from critics. Any agreement to replace some of them with positive quotes to maintain Wiki neutrality? (Antinate (talk) 06:12, 27 September 2015 (UTC))

This is factually wrong. There is more positive review than negative. zzz (talk) 12:28, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

I'm not here for a conversation about what is or isn't an objective fact. Each of the quotes are a bit backhanded, in my opinion. So I'm leaving the neutrality tag until there's actual discussion about the content of the quotes, not impulsive "nope, you're wrong"s. (Antinate (talk) 17:03, 27 September 2015 (UTC))

There's nothing actionable in what you're now saying, except, you could try adding another review. zzz (talk) 18:18, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

• C-Class television articles
• Low-importance television articles
• WikiProject Television articles