This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Vaulter (talk | contribs) at 22:15, 27 September 2015. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 22:15, 27 September 2015 by Vaulter (talk | contribs)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Television C‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||
|
"Positive" Reception
It reads contradictory to say that the show received positive reviews from critics, but then follow it (almost exclusively) with derisive quotes from critics. Any agreement to replace some of them with positive quotes to maintain Wiki neutrality? (Antinate (talk) 06:12, 27 September 2015 (UTC))
- This is factually wrong. There is more positive review than negative. zzz (talk) 12:28, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
- I'm not here for a conversation about what is or isn't an objective fact. Each of the quotes are a bit backhanded, in my opinion. So I'm leaving the neutrality tag until there's actual discussion about the content of the quotes, not impulsive "nope, you're wrong"s. (Antinate (talk) 17:03, 27 September 2015 (UTC))
- There's nothing actionable in what you're now saying, except, you could try adding another review. zzz (talk) 18:18, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
- He's saying it's an issue of undue weight to include only negative reviews when the show has received generally positive reviews, which I agree with. The section ought to be rewritten. Calidum 22:15, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
- There's nothing actionable in what you're now saying, except, you could try adding another review. zzz (talk) 18:18, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
- I'm not here for a conversation about what is or isn't an objective fact. Each of the quotes are a bit backhanded, in my opinion. So I'm leaving the neutrality tag until there's actual discussion about the content of the quotes, not impulsive "nope, you're wrong"s. (Antinate (talk) 17:03, 27 September 2015 (UTC))