Misplaced Pages

User talk:Boxingmojo

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by CambridgeBayWeather (talk | contribs) at 06:49, 29 September 2015 (You have been blocked from editing to prevent further disruption caused by your engagement in an edit war. (TW)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 06:49, 29 September 2015 by CambridgeBayWeather (talk | contribs) (You have been blocked from editing to prevent further disruption caused by your engagement in an edit war. (TW))(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Boxingmojo, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Teahouse logo

Hi Boxingmojo! Thanks for contributing to Misplaced Pages. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Misplaced Pages and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Dathus (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the TeahouseThis message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:22, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Ahmed Mohamed clock incident

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Misplaced Pages. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Template:Z33 -

Cirt (talk) 23:15, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

Boxingmojo, your most recent revert on the subject is also a three-revert rule violation, so I suggest you self-revert it for now. (Note, as an aside, that WP:3RR covers reversions "in whole or in part"; restoring only some parts of the section still counts as a revert.) --Aquillion (talk) 23:49, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

September 2015

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Ahmed Mohamed clock incident. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring states:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Jbh 23:46, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.  CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:49, 29 September 2015 (UTC)