This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Beyond My Ken (talk | contribs) at 03:15, 10 October 2015 (→Siscretionary sanction notifications). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 03:15, 10 October 2015 by Beyond My Ken (talk | contribs) (→Siscretionary sanction notifications)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff) |
This user is an legitimate alternative account. This template confirms that the user is familiar with Misplaced Pages policy on using multiple accounts and that this account will not be used for sock puppetry. You may discuss this account here on the user's talk page or email this user with any questions. |
Please...
...link this account to your primary account, as required by policy. BMK (talk) 20:39, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
- Nah, not required by policy "when doing so would defeat the purpose of having a legitimate alternative account" -- the only folks you should tell are the checkusers (not any ol' admin). Just be scrupulous to not double post in the same forum / discussion page. NE Ent 20:56, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
- If doing so "would defeat the purpose..." then this account should make it abundantly clear what that purpose is. This can be done without self-outing. BMK (talk) 21:06, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
- The purpose of this alternate account is to allow me to edit articles and participate in discussions related to those articles where there is a significant chance of being branded as pro-gamergate, anti-gamergate, global warming denialist, global warming alarmist, pinko liberal, tea-party conservative, etc. on Misplaced Pages or when there is a significant chance of being harassed off-wiki. I have already been branded (by a Misplaced Pages administrator no less) with "CypherPunkyBrewster is an account apparently created to advance the cause of climate change denial" even though I fully agree with the scientific consensus on climate change." Why? because I dared to express the opinion that one reference was getting too much WP:WEIGHT and calling for it to be replaced with a better source.
- Now that I have answered the question asked, I have a question of my own. BMK, what is your purpose of demanding that I reveal my primary account, even going so far as to fabricate a policy that does not exist? What, exactly, did you plan on doing with that information? You have already publicly accused me of advancing the cause of climate change denial (without, of course, a single diff that shows me doing any such thing), so I can only assume that you want to know my main account in order to attempt to destroy my reputation and falsely brand me as a "denier" (a term calculated to bring to mind holocaust deniers). In the same comment you assume that I am being disruptive, but again not a single diff showing me being disruptive in any way. This is exactly why I created an alternate account; to protect my real-world reputation from people like you. CypherPunkyBrewster (talk) 17:49, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
- Gee, I was planning on selling the information to the highest bidder, of course, wasn't that obvious when I came in here in my black cape, twirling my moustache?(Oh, and everything you said is pure bullshit - I don't even believe that you believe it, and I certainly don't believe your stated reasons for having an alternate account. Your attitude and the way you've gone about things makes it abundantly clear -- at least to me -- that you want the account in order to avoid scutiny of your editing.) BMK (talk) 02:46, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
- Now that I have answered the question asked, I have a question of my own. BMK, what is your purpose of demanding that I reveal my primary account, even going so far as to fabricate a policy that does not exist? What, exactly, did you plan on doing with that information? You have already publicly accused me of advancing the cause of climate change denial (without, of course, a single diff that shows me doing any such thing), so I can only assume that you want to know my main account in order to attempt to destroy my reputation and falsely brand me as a "denier" (a term calculated to bring to mind holocaust deniers). In the same comment you assume that I am being disruptive, but again not a single diff showing me being disruptive in any way. This is exactly why I created an alternate account; to protect my real-world reputation from people like you. CypherPunkyBrewster (talk) 17:49, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
Siscretionary sanction notifications
This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Misplaced Pages. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding Climate change, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.Template:Z33 BMK (talk) 22:08, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Misplaced Pages. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding the Tea Party movement, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.
This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Misplaced Pages. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to, (a) GamerGate, (b) any gender-related dispute or controversy, (c) people associated with (a) or (b), all broadly construed, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.