Misplaced Pages talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Catflap08 and Hijiri88/Evidence

< Misplaced Pages talk:Arbitration | Requests | Case | Catflap08 and Hijiri88

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by AlbinoFerret (talk | contribs) at 12:38, 23 October 2015 (→Curly Turkey: notified). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 12:38, 23 October 2015 by AlbinoFerret (talk | contribs) (→Curly Turkey: notified)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff) Main case page (Talk) — Evidence (Talk) — Workshop (Talk) — Proposed decision (Talk)

Case clerk: TBD Drafting arbitrator: TBD

Misplaced Pages Arbitration

About arbitration Talk Arbitration policy (CU/OS) Guide to arbitration Noticeboard + Talk Search archived proceedings Ban appeals Report
Open proceedings All open requests Case requests Clarification and Amendment requests Arbitrator motion requests Enforcement requests
Active sanctions Contentious topics (Log) General sanctions Editor sanctions
Arbitration Committee Discuss + Contact Members Procedures Elections Talk History Clerks + Talk Clerk procedures Conflict of interest reports
Audit Talk Statistics Talk Reports (pre-2016)

Track related changes
v t e

Behaviour on this page: Arbitration case pages exist to assist the Arbitration Committee in arriving at a fair, well-informed decision. You are required to act with appropriate decorum during this case. While grievances must often be aired during a case, you are expected to air them without being rude or hostile, and to respond calmly to allegations against you. Accusations of misbehaviour posted in this case must be proven with clear evidence (and otherwise not made at all). Editors who conduct themselves inappropriately during a case may be sanctioned by an arbitrator or clerk, without further warning, by being banned from further participation in the case, or being blocked altogether. Personal attacks against other users, including arbitrators or clerks, will be met with sanctions. Behavior during a case may also be considered by the committee in arriving at a final decision.

Curly Turkey

Curly Turkey has involved himself in the sections on AN/I the section on Denis Brown's talk page. and has started a new section on AN/I dealing with CurtisNaito at History of Japan dealing with a GA nomination. Its possible that his name will pop up. I am not sure if he should be added to the case. But I believe in all fairness he should be notified of the case in case his name does come up and evidence is presented that includes him. I leave it up to the arbs if he should be added. AlbinoFerret 12:34, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

Notified of this section here. AlbinoFerret 12:37, 23 October 2015 (UTC)