This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Publicgirluk (talk | contribs) at 06:35, 10 August 2006 (→[]). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 06:35, 10 August 2006 by Publicgirluk (talk | contribs) (→[])(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Lindsay Ann Wheatcroft
Non-notable porn site star, all links lead to porn sites. IMHO, it should be deleted (1) as advertising; (2) as unverifiable by any reliable source; and (3) as non-notable pursuant to WP:BIO and WP:PORN BIO TheronJ 03:55, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
- Delete does not look good naked. plus everything that was said above. Somerset219 04:14, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:BIO. Cited source doesn't look reputable and I was unable to find any other sources on the matter. -- Koffieyahoo 04:26, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Though I liked the old woman trying to haul her old husband away from the "actress" in that picture. Resolute 04:29, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. Source provides links to multiple newspaper article scans. All newspapers are mainstream national and local UK papers. Article provides link to website where actress publishes her work - can delete link if felt to be advertising. Deletion because she doesn't look good naked would remove most Bio's from Misplaced Pages. If you want to verify the sources then contact the paper's or court in question and they will provide transcrips as is custom in UK. Actress is notable in UK for the Porn she specialises and generates national TV and Newspaper coverage as well as local. Not being famous in US is not a criteria for deletion.