This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Ginnre (talk | contribs) at 19:26, 11 August 2006 (→Welcome to Misplaced Pages). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 19:26, 11 August 2006 by Ginnre (talk | contribs) (→Welcome to Misplaced Pages)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)signed in due to the Dokdo issue. Basically I'm glad to see the title moved from Liancourt Rocks to Dokdo. 'Liancourt Rocks' is not neutral at all. Japan pushes hard for "Liancourt Rocks' very much to get rid of the name 'Dokdo'.
Welcome!
Additional tips:
- Here are some extra tips to help you get around Misplaced Pages:
- If you made any edits before you got an account, you might be interested in assigning those to your username.
- If you want to play around with your new Wiki skills, try the Sandbox.
- Click on the Edit button on a page, and look at how other editors did what they did.
- You can sign your name using three tildes, like this: ~~~. If you use four, you can add a datestamp too. Always sign comments on Talk pages, never sign Articles.
- You might want to add yourself to the New User Log
- If your first language isn't English, try Misplaced Pages:Contributing to articles outside your native language
- As a Korean wikipedian, you might want to take a look at Portal:Korea and engage with people of your country.
- And lastly, please sign off with Four tides.
- I hope that this message would help you to familarise with wikipedia's workings, though. Happy editings!
Mr Tan 06:52, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
Thanks! Ginnre 16:24, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
Discuss Before Reverting
The Liancourt Rocks page is likely to become locked when you engage in edit wars. They are not helpful, and clearly harm the article. You mention awareness of the policy to develop consensus by discussion, but are not participating in the discussion yourself. Instead, you are reverting without discussion.
Hello, I'm ]. Misplaced Pages is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on ]. Thank you. LactoseTI 18:40, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
- Well in the discussion part it looked so clear for me so I changed to my version just once and it was not revert. Don't exaggerate. Ginnre 19:26, 11 August 2006 (UTC)