Dear Future Husband question
Would it be appropriate to add to the page that there is a version released to Radio Disney that has altered lyrics, and then add the before and after altered lyrics? Thanks. ilovechristianmusic 17:38, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
- If it's reliably sourced it would be notable, though I think stating which lyrics were altered would be unnecessary. - Lips 17:28, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker)Reliable sources alone do not establish notability. See this for more. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 20:38, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
- The fact the song had to have its lyrics altered for a release on a major radio station in the US is a notable enough inclusion if reliably sourced, is it not? - Lips 20:57, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
- @Lips Are Movin: Thank you for your help.
- @Winkelvi: How am I being a page stalker? ilovechristianmusic 13:11, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
- TPS is indicating to the userspace inhabitant that I am responding because the page is on my watchlist or I noticed the discussion. It's not saying you are a TPS. Lips, you seem to have a misconception regarding what makes for notability in relation to articles and content. Please read WP:NOTABILITY to get a clearer picture. One or two reliable source mentions may not give that content the notability required for inclusion. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 17:23, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
- I think you maybe misinterpreted what I meant with "If it's reliably sourced it would be notable". I definitely did not mean just anything could be included if it's sourced, but in ILCM's case, the info he/she wants to include is indeed notable. I am familiar with WP:NOTABILITY, but a reminder is of course never harmless so ty for the tip! - Lips 17:57, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
Thanks
Thanks for your post on Winkelvi's talk page. That showed real class. --NeilN 05:13, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks. I felt very much guilty and embarrassed reading back on the personal attacks I made. A learning experience. - Lips 05:28, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
Be encouraged
I haven't taken a look at any of your contributions or edits but noticed your post in the Teahouse. Can I just say that I was/am exactly in the same place. Please, please don't stop editing. Please know that almost all serious editors want to see you succeed and prosper, making good contributions to the encyclopedia. You are welcome to visit me on my own talk page for the whole story; I even have been blocked and have had two very terrible discussions posted for all to see on the ANI (adminstrator's notice board incident)about me. If it makes you feel even a little bit better, you won't have any trouble recognizing one of your detractors from the Teahouse make some pretty negative remarks about me. You are also welcome to email me, the link will appear in the left hand column on my talk page. Best Regards,
- Teahouse host-ess, Bfpage |leave a message 18:16, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks for the words of encouragement. I've had a bit of breather, apologized for my behavior and sorted my issues out. It's been a bit of learning experience for me, something all inexperienced editors have to go through I guess. - Lips 18:49, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
There's no rush
Obviously, you are having problems with posting. Why not just wait to comment until you are at a computer that won't cause glitchy-problems, rather than creating more history than necessary at the Trainor talk page with deleting the errors caused by your mobile device. There's no rush, and no deadline in Misplaced Pages, so don't worry about it right now. Okay? -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 17:06, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
- Okay thanks, will do. I'll be able to do replies tomorrow afternoon if I have spare time at work. I still think archiving two or three of the other older discussions from 3/4 months ago wouldn't do any harm. - Lips 17:10, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
- Sorry, I guess I didn't understand that it was past discussions you wanted archived, I thought you were wanting the current discussions archived. I will look into it and see if it's too soon to archive the past discussions. But, on that note, I have to say that to do it just for one user who is having computer issues would probably be considered a bit unorthodox. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 17:44, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
- WP:ARCHIVE says
The talk page guidelines suggest archiving when the talk page exceeds 75 KB (or 75,000 bytes), or has multiple resolved or stale discussions. The talk page is on 114,000 bytes+, a lot of the relevant issues in older discussions were resolved. I know it's a bit selfish and demanding of me to ask, but I don't want my access problems to drag out the BRD process for everyone. I know both me and BBMC are keen to move through it as swiftly as possible. Thanks for the consideration. - Lips 18:02, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
Track listing headings
You may be interested in giving your opinion on which track listing format is best to use for Misplaced Pages here. ilovechristianmusic 13:35, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello Lips. Haven't heard from you in a while. Just so you know, I've added your name to this linked page to due inactivity. Remember to remove yourself from the list if you ever come back. Snuggums (talk / edits) 06:56, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
|
