User talk:TruthIsDivine - Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by TruthIsDivine (talk | contribs) at 23:19, 6 December 2015 (Fix that fraud! The reference they cite says "1 million is far too high" but those two vandals claim it says 33 million. They are here to destroy Misplaced Pages and must be stopped.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 23:19, 6 December 2015 by TruthIsDivine (talk | contribs) (Fix that fraud! The reference they cite says "1 million is far too high" but those two vandals claim it says 33 million. They are here to destroy Misplaced Pages and must be stopped.)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

The Gary Kleck article is governed in part by the policy at WP:BLP (Biographies of Living People). Potentially controversial information added to that page must be accompanied by a reliable source, which is why I've removed your latest addition. If you provide a source, the information can be returned to the article. Thanks. clpo13_(talk) 22:15, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring. The thread is Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:TruthIsDivine reported by User:Gaijin42 (Result: ). Thank you. Gaijin42 (talk) 22:16, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Gun control

If you read Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Gun control#October 2015 you can see that the ban was suspended as of October. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:28, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 days for attempting to harass other users. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Rs chen 7754 22:37, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

Template:Z8

Note to any reviewing administrator: this user is likely violating other policies (and is editing contentiously in an ArbCom-related area) and I will not object to any firmer sanctions that another admin implements. --Rs chen 7754 22:39, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

Rschen7754 In a case of exceptionally poor timing I just finished making this report Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#TruthIsDivine you may wish to drop in and shortcircuit the report since he's already blocked, but with the personal attacks and edit warring, I think WP:NOTHERE may be in play. Gaijin42 (talk) 22:40, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

Gaijin42 inserted fake statistics into the Defensive Gun Use article which I tried to remove, since his references have no citation of the 33 million figure. It is wholly invented. He Removed the accurately cited statistics I added

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

TruthIsDivine (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

== Gaijin42 inserted fake statistics into the Defensive Gun Use article which I tried to remove, since his references have no citation of the 33 million figure. It is wholly invented. He Removed the accurately cited statistics I added ==

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

TruthIsDivine (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

your reason here TruthIsDivine (talk) 22:57, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=your reason here ] (]) 22:57, 6 December 2015 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=your reason here ] (]) 22:57, 6 December 2015 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=your reason here ] (]) 22:57, 6 December 2015 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Template:Unblockreason=Your reason here22:54, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=== Gaijin42 inserted fake statistics into the Defensive Gun Use article which I tried to remove, since his references have no citation of the 33 million figure. It is wholly invented. He Removed the accurately cited statistics I added ==
<span id="rfu"></span>
<div class="user-block unblock user-unblock-request" style="padding: 5px; margin-bottom: 0.5em; border: 1px solid #a9a9a9; background-color: #EBF4FF;">
] '''This user is asking that their ] be reviewed''':
] <span class="plainlinks" style="font-size:88%;">( •  •  • ]<span class="sysop-show"> • ]</span> •  • <span class="sysop-show"> • ] • </span><span class="checkuser-show"> •  ()</span>)</span>
<div style="clear:both;" class=></div>
----
'''Request reason''':
<div style="margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 2em;">your reason here ] (]) 22:57, 6 December 2015 (UTC)</div>
'''Notes''':
* In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please ''']'''. If no block is listed, then you have been ] by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these ] instead for quick attention by an administrator.
* Please read our ] to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
<div class="mw-collapsible mw-collapsed sysop-show" style="border: none;"><div style="background-color: #D0E4FF; font-weight: bold; text-align: center">
] use only:</div>
<div class="mw-collapsible-content" style="text-align: left;">
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "<span class="monospaced">blocking administrator</span>" with the name of the blocking admin:
:<code>{{Unblock on hold |1=''blocking administrator'' |2=''your reason here ] (]) 22:57, 6 December 2015 (UTC)'' |3 = ~~~~}}</code>
If you '''decline''' the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting <code>{{subst:Decline reason here}}</code> with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a ], explaining why the request was declined.
:<code>{{unblock reviewed |1=''your reason here ] (]) 22:57, 6 December 2015 (UTC)'' |decline = ''{{subst:Decline reason here}}'' ~~~~}}</code>
If you '''accept''' the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting <code>Accept reason here</code> with your rationale:
:<code>{{unblock reviewed |1=''your reason here ] (]) 22:57, 6 December 2015 (UTC)'' |accept = ''accept reason here'' ~~~~}}</code>
</div></div></div>
]
]22:54, 6 December 2015 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

{{unblock reviewed |1=== Gaijin42 inserted fake statistics into the Defensive Gun Use article which I tried to remove, since his references have no citation of the 33 million figure. It is wholly invented. He Removed the accurately cited statistics I added ==
<span id="rfu"></span>
<div class="user-block unblock user-unblock-request" style="padding: 5px; margin-bottom: 0.5em; border: 1px solid #a9a9a9; background-color: #EBF4FF;">
] '''This user is asking that their ] be reviewed''':
] <span class="plainlinks" style="font-size:88%;">( •  •  • ]<span class="sysop-show"> • ]</span> •  • <span class="sysop-show"> • ] • </span><span class="checkuser-show"> •  ()</span>)</span>
<div style="clear:both;" class=></div>
----
'''Request reason''':
<div style="margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 2em;">your reason here ] (]) 22:57, 6 December 2015 (UTC)</div>
'''Notes''':
* In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please ''']'''. If no block is listed, then you have been ] by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these ] instead for quick attention by an administrator.
* Please read our ] to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
<div class="mw-collapsible mw-collapsed sysop-show" style="border: none;"><div style="background-color: #D0E4FF; font-weight: bold; text-align: center">
] use only:</div>
<div class="mw-collapsible-content" style="text-align: left;">
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "<span class="monospaced">blocking administrator</span>" with the name of the blocking admin:
:<code>{{Unblock on hold |1=''blocking administrator'' |2=''your reason here ] (]) 22:57, 6 December 2015 (UTC)'' |3 = ~~~~}}</code>
If you '''decline''' the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting <code>{{subst:Decline reason here}}</code> with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a ], explaining why the request was declined.
:<code>{{unblock reviewed |1=''your reason here ] (]) 22:57, 6 December 2015 (UTC)'' |decline = ''{{subst:Decline reason here}}'' ~~~~}}</code>
If you '''accept''' the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting <code>Accept reason here</code> with your rationale:
:<code>{{unblock reviewed |1=''your reason here ] (]) 22:57, 6 December 2015 (UTC)'' |accept = ''accept reason here'' ~~~~}}</code>
</div></div></div>
]
]22:54, 6 December 2015 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=== Gaijin42 inserted fake statistics into the Defensive Gun Use article which I tried to remove, since his references have no citation of the 33 million figure. It is wholly invented. He Removed the accurately cited statistics I added ==
<span id="rfu"></span>
<div class="user-block unblock user-unblock-request" style="padding: 5px; margin-bottom: 0.5em; border: 1px solid #a9a9a9; background-color: #EBF4FF;">
] '''This user is asking that their ] be reviewed''':
] <span class="plainlinks" style="font-size:88%;">( •  •  • ]<span class="sysop-show"> • ]</span> •  • <span class="sysop-show"> • ] • </span><span class="checkuser-show"> •  ()</span>)</span>
<div style="clear:both;" class=></div>
----
'''Request reason''':
<div style="margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 2em;">your reason here ] (]) 22:57, 6 December 2015 (UTC)</div>
'''Notes''':
* In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please ''']'''. If no block is listed, then you have been ] by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these ] instead for quick attention by an administrator.
* Please read our ] to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
<div class="mw-collapsible mw-collapsed sysop-show" style="border: none;"><div style="background-color: #D0E4FF; font-weight: bold; text-align: center">
] use only:</div>
<div class="mw-collapsible-content" style="text-align: left;">
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "<span class="monospaced">blocking administrator</span>" with the name of the blocking admin:
:<code>{{Unblock on hold |1=''blocking administrator'' |2=''your reason here ] (]) 22:57, 6 December 2015 (UTC)'' |3 = ~~~~}}</code>
If you '''decline''' the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting <code>{{subst:Decline reason here}}</code> with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a ], explaining why the request was declined.
:<code>{{unblock reviewed |1=''your reason here ] (]) 22:57, 6 December 2015 (UTC)'' |decline = ''{{subst:Decline reason here}}'' ~~~~}}</code>
If you '''accept''' the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting <code>Accept reason here</code> with your rationale:
:<code>{{unblock reviewed |1=''your reason here ] (]) 22:57, 6 December 2015 (UTC)'' |accept = ''accept reason here'' ~~~~}}</code>
</div></div></div>
]
]22:54, 6 December 2015 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

. gaijin42's references do not say what he says they say. He is unable to produce a quoted citation showing the 33 million figure. He is making it up. If you want to have an encyclopedia with made up facts, where someone can add a figure of 33 million that they invented and which isn't in the article, please go ahead. But I don't think that's an encyclopedia anymore. As for me, I added a cited , with inline citations reference showing that there are only 1600 verified DGUs yearly. Not only that, Gaijins claim is not logically possible. Any elementary logic shows that what he is claiming is impossible. Think about what you are doing in allowing a vandal like Gaijin to insert fake statistics into articles to suit a political agenda when he has already been topic banned from this area and was just reinstated. He is indeed committing fraud by inserting statistics that aren't in the reference. Also, his reference is 20 years old and is intellectually discredited years ago. You might as well replace the Period Table page with Phlogiston theory. Also, he has been blocked from editing in that area previously likely because he inserts fake statistics into articles. 33 million, or even 1'million, are not logically possible figures. They removed the ACTUALLY VERIFIED FIGURE OF 1600 which I posted with refs and inline citation to suit their own misguided beliefs. You should not allow erroneous information to be posted in an encyclopedia. The reference nowhere says 33 million, and even the 1 million figure is ludicrous.

Regardless, personal attacks to other users is not acceptable. You can disagree and still be civil. --allthefoxes 22:57, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

Don't you care that a user is getting away with making up statistics and adding them to articles? Isn't that vandalism? There is no citation that says 33 million and he has managed to get it back in there by blocking me. Do you care that your encyclopedia contains intentional falsehoods or not?

The source for the 33 million number has been pointed out to you multiple times. https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Talk:Defensive_gun_use&diff=prev&oldid=694067709 Gaijin42 (talk) 23:01, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

How about the quotation of the sentence in the article that says 33 million. You send the reference but the reference doesn't say what you say it does. Thus, you are a liar (and a hillbilly.)

The actual, verified figure is 1584 in 2014. You are only off by, oh, say 2 million times, friend.

Sure, I do care, and I'll look into it. Regardless, you were still blocked for personal attacks and harassment. And that's still not okay, even against a vandal. --allthefoxes 23:05, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

By the way, this is what the reference that they claim actually supports their "33 million" figure says: "This paper used survey methods similar to those employed in a recent widely cited study by Kleck and Gertz (1995) and produced comparable results; yet our comparison of estimates based on NSPOF with other sources, together with puzzling inconsistencies in over a third of the defensive gun use (DGU) reports, lead us to conclude that the estimates are far too high. " it does not support 33 million, it actually says the 1 million figure is far ton high. Please think how illogical it is to think that there are 1 million defensive gun uses in the United States, and 1 million violent crimes. This is like claiming "in 200 percent of burglaries, a home alarm prevented the burglary." It DOES NOT MAKE SENSE.TruthIsDivine (talk) 22:57, 6 December 2015 (UTC)}} Template:Unblockreason=Your reason here22:54, 6 December 2015 (UTC)}}. gaijin42's references do not say what he says they say. He is unable to produce a quoted citation showing the 33 million figure. He is making it up. If you want to have an encyclopedia with made up facts, where someone can add a figure of 33 million that they invented and which isn't in the article, please go ahead. But I don't think that's an encyclopedia anymore. As for me, I added a cited , with inline citations reference showing that there are only 1600 verified DGUs yearly. Not only that, Gaijins claim is not logically possible. Any elementary logic shows that what he is claiming is impossible. Think about what you are doing in allowing a vandal like Gaijin to insert fake statistics into articles to suit a political agenda when he has already been topic banned from this area and was just reinstated. He is indeed committing fraud by inserting statistics that aren't in the reference. Also, his reference is 20 years old and is intellectually discredited years ago. You might as well replace the Period Table page with Phlogiston theory. Also, he has been blocked from editing in that area previously likely because he inserts fake statistics into articles. 33 million, or even 1'million, are not logically possible figures. They removed the ACTUALLY VERIFIED FIGURE OF 1600 which I posted with refs and inline citation to suit their own misguided beliefs. You should not allow erroneous information to be posted in an encyclopedia. The reference nowhere says 33 million, and even the 1 million figure is ludicrous.

Regardless, personal attacks to other users is not acceptable. You can disagree and still be civil. --allthefoxes 22:57, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

How about the quotation of the sentence in the article that says 33 million. You send the reference but the reference doesn't say what you say it does. Thus, you are a liar (and a hillbilly.)

The actual, verified figure is 1584 in 2014. You are only off by, oh, say 2 million times, friend.

Category:

Requests for unblock