This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Mitchazenia (talk | contribs) at 22:29, 13 August 2006 (moved User talk:Mitchazenia to User talk:Mitchazenia (HurricaneCraze32): adding HC32 to it). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 22:29, 13 August 2006 by Mitchazenia (talk | contribs) (moved User talk:Mitchazenia to User talk:Mitchazenia (HurricaneCraze32): adding HC32 to it)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Template:HurricaneCraze32/Directing Buttons
Talk:HurricaneCraze32/ArchiveD
Minor Edits
Remember to mark your edits as minor when, but only when, they genuinely are (see Misplaced Pages:Minor edit). Marking a major change as a minor one, or vice versa, is condsidered poor etiquette. The rule of thumb is that an edit of a page that is spelling corrections, formatting, and minor rearranging of text should be flagged as a 'minor edit'. Nilfanion (talk) 21:11, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
- Yes I guessed that. :P You really should only tag edits as minor edits when they are that kind of thing. Also, edit summaries are veryuseful. Yes they are a bit inconvenient, but if you do them it helps other editors know whats going on.--Nilfanion (talk) 23:19, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
- Well, I'm not going to make any articles for the foreseeable future, I've got more important tasks than writing articles on fishspinners. I'll let Hink assess it he will be along soon I'm sure, hes been doing more of that lately.--Nilfanion (talk) 23:28, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
1987 depressions
It will take me a while to look though stuff in order to find the old tracking maps. My guess is they're still at the parent's home, and if that's true, it will take months to access. I'll look up the reanalysis spreadsheet and see if much is mentioned about them. Thegreatdr 01:31, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
Re: Kate
Ehh, I think Irfanfaiz's Kate article is better. However, I don't think you should continue publishing them. We should work more on getting the existing articles towards better status, like Fabian, before adding more no-impact start articles. Hurricanehink (talk) 02:43, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
Calm down
Please calm down with the article creations. We don't need those new articles on the low-impact storms. Instead, please go back and fix up some of the articles you made. Inline sources are a good start. Try and find records and impact for them. Also, there's plenty of information in the tropical discussions. Hurricanehink (talk) 17:34, 13 August 2006 (UTC)