Misplaced Pages

User talk:Eaglestorm

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Ohnoitsjamie (talk | contribs) at 16:04, 13 January 2016 (no). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 16:04, 13 January 2016 by Ohnoitsjamie (talk | contribs) (no)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Cite error: There are <ref> tags on this page without content in them (see the help page).

This is Eaglestorm's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

Archives
  1. 2007
  2. 2008
  3. 2009
  4. 2010
  5. 2011
  6. 2012
  7. 2013
  8. 2015

January 2016

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for making personal attacks towards other editors. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 13:52, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Eaglestorm (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This block is highly unjustifiable due to proponents ganging up to undo all the hard work many editors have done for years by inserting their own deletionist agenda and working in an ad hoc alliance against me, which includes other people who have taken it upon themselves to join the discussion in another field. This is the kind of editing dictatorship that has turned off people who wanted to contribute. These people wantonly delete material that's taken years to create but yet the same kind of material exists in other articles. One of those people is only good at deletions and tagging but does not even try to make it better with the existing material. Bringing this nonsensical dispute to ANI only signifies their determination to muzzle my work and what personal attacks are these people taking about? I can't even believe these accusations of harassment. Why? Did I ever leave a message on their talk pages and trolled their contributions? The fact that there's none only shows their desperation, and don't bother using this argument against me, you people want me to debase myself at the hands of people who have their own personal agendas against me. As much as I want this block revoked, but their claims should not be dignified and everything must be kept the way they were before those people came along and RUINED EVERYTHING. Eaglestorm (talk) 15:28, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Decline reason:

WP:NOTTHEM. OhNoitsJamie 16:04, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

To the reviewing administrator: there is some relevant discussion at Eaglestorm and How I Met Your Mother articles — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 15:40, 13 January 2016 (UTC)