This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Zezen (talk | contribs) at 13:38, 16 January 2016 (→WP:Talk: Another third-party voice). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 13:38, 16 January 2016 by Zezen (talk | contribs) (→WP:Talk: Another third-party voice)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)June 2014
Hello, I'm TJRC. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to the page Minehead, because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. See in particular WP:ELPOINTS. TJRC (talk) 17:14, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
- Argh, my apologies, Nosdan, I read the diff wrong and thought you were adding the EL. Your edit was exactly right and mine exactly wrong. Thanks also to Rodw (talk · contribs) for correcting me and leaving me the note. I must really need this vacation I'm about to take. TJRC (talk) 20:29, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
WP:Talk
Per the WP:Talk guideline, do stop messing with my comments. Things like this, where you are concerned about all the other one-time and barely-there accounts, only help prove my case. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 06:58, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Reported at WP:ANI. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 07:54, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Flyer22 Reborn stay out of my talk page, my time is far too valuable to have to waste it on paranoid conspiracy theory nutjobs. Nosdan (talk) 08:05, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 11:47, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
You have been blocked for three days for editing others comments such as you did here . Despite the recommendations above that you not. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 11:47, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
sorry i didnt realise good faith editing was frowned upon? did you not read the part where i have spent the whole day trying to fight trolling false accusations? and where this was well past a time where i shouldnt have to deal with such accusations and slander? being that you are apparently some form of admin, if you have the authority i would like to be able to "prove" my obvious existence and forgo all these bullshit accusations and finally put this subject of me no existing "to rest"? Nosdan (talk) 12:05, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
- We all agree that you exist and I do not think anyone believes you are a bot. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 12:08, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
- This sort of edit is not encouraging Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 12:39, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
edit: of course, i am going to appeal your block, and petition for the removal of your "powers" to troll because of your obvious overuse of them. its not that a block of 3 days is important when i rarely even edit more than once every 3 months, let alone 3 weeks or 3 days..... but as i am sure you understand its the point of the matter. i hope you have as greater day as i have :) goodnight Nosdan (talk) 12:13, 15 January 2016 (UTC) neither is the accusation of "The Nosdan account" as if i am simply an "object" that she can objectifyNosdan (talk) 12:43, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Dear Nosdan: as you can check, I have not been involved in any of your edits or admin actions so far. I came here to check the reasons for the uncivil comments on Vote pages. As a third-party Wikipedian, I also ask you to stop behaving that way, if only for the good of the WP project itself. Zezen (talk) 13:38, 16 January 2016 (UTC)