This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Sue Anne (talk | contribs) at 20:30, 19 August 2006 (Problems with edits to Apprentice 4 article). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 20:30, 19 August 2006 by Sue Anne (talk | contribs) (Problems with edits to Apprentice 4 article)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)|
This is the talk page for "the darkest Wikipedian ever". | |
|---|---|
|
All talk regarding about me and my edits should be directed here. I prefer concise messages. The only rule I have is to keep your discussions/messages as clean as possible. I need to know right away if an article that I have either edited/deleted/moved might cause any link discrepancies. Please let me know about it and I'll rectify it with the fullest extent of my strength at the shortest time possible. It is VERY IMPORTANT to sign your comments using four tildes ( |
Please respect Etiquette, assume good faith and be nice. |
Page last archived by Vesther (U * T/R * CTD) 04:24, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
- Heated Debates in the last 2-3 weeks
- Past Heated Debates
- Dead Discussions 1
re Sennheiser
I don't know why you decided that I have a beef with Sennheiser as a whole and not the Sennheiser article. I love Sennheiser products, and have found them to design the most comfortable headphones I've ever worn. I have no problem with editing as I see fit either, but I've found that asking about things in place already tends to give me more information on deciding if and/or how to edit something. Like I said in its talk page, I wasn't trying to be facetious.RCHM 05:18, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
- The only reason why I was inquiring was because you had some NPOV issues with the article, that's all. Try not to panic, as I'm just curious. — Vesther (U * T/R * CTD) 10:49, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Bose Headphone Family
Hay man I was wondering if I could get you involved with the debate here. I know that you voted already but I was wondering if you could help me with the comments throught the article. Right now it looks like we have a 7/7 tie. I hope that you can help, after all we have spent a lot of time creating the article it would be a shame to loose it. Chat to ya later :) -- UKPhoenix79 23:13, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
Problems with edits to Apprentice 4 article
- Manual of style -- Please review the manual of style, especially when it comes to headings or the start of bullets. Things like "Initial Boardroom" should be "Initial boardroom". Also, on some of these fan articles, we do tend to use first names for the contestants, but Trump shouldn't be changed to Mr. Trump.
- Many of your edits, in my opinion, cross the line when it comes to cruft and throwing in your opinions and/or personal wording to things (aka "original research"). I've been trying to clean these up and source everything as much as possible. You don't need to rewrite everything. I have agreed with some criticism of you in the past that you tend to think you WP:OWN the articles that you work on, and often I don't think your edits make the article better from an encyclopaedic standpoint.