This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Hateless (talk | contribs) at 23:46, 19 August 2006 (→[]). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 23:46, 19 August 2006 by Hateless (talk | contribs) (→[])(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Welcome!
Hello, Otto4711, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Misplaced Pages Boot Camp, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}}
on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.
Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Where to ask a question, ask me or a helper Commander Keane on our talk page. Again, welcome!
If you want to tell me something or if you just want to say hi, leave your message under the Talk Section of | My Talk Page
Ω Anonymous anonymous Ψ: ''Have A Nice Day'' 21:25, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
Otto4711
There's a page I want to split but I can't find step-by-step instructions on how to do it, to make sure that existing links point to the split-off page, etc.
- What's the page, and what's the kind of splitting you want to do? -- Drini 20:29, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
- Irina Derevko, I want to split the section on Katya Derevko off onto its own page and make sure all the links which currently redirect to Irina get pointed to the new page.Otto4711 21:26, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
- Also I would like to know how to insert the Character chart that's found at the bottom of the Irina page into the new page and how to add characters to the chart.Otto4711 21:34, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
- What's the page, and what's the kind of splitting you want to do? -- Drini 20:29, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
Firstly, take a look at Misplaced Pages:Manual of Style (writing about fiction).
I'm not advocating the splitting of the article - perhaps an Alias wiki (that deals just with Alias) is what you are looking for.
To do the split you just create the new article. You would need to check the "What links here" for the Irina Derevko page (available in the toolbox, under the search bar) to fix any links. The "Character chart" is a template available at Template:alias. Any change to the template will affect all pages it's used on - so discuss on the talk page first.--Commander Keane 22:35, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
OK, I give up
How do I add something to a category page, for example http://en.wikipedia.org/Category:Fictional_technology
- To add a page to that category you do not edit the category page itself. You add ] at the bottom of the article you want to add. Check out any article, eg Tai Nam Wan, to see how categories are added.--Commander Keane 07:36, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
TAR
Hello Otto...thanks for your note. I guess the 'issue' about Frankenberry is that there are multiple editors of the page all of whom don't recall this nickname. As I stated, I've just rewatched all the episodes (not because of this!) and don't hear it. If it is in there once, does that constitue a real nickname? If I am hearing Fran N' Barry but they said Frankenberry once...does that truly need to be in the page. I guess that will be a discussion point. As you might have seen I have reopened the discussion on the TAR discussion page. With regards to having to 'prove' this, all the other nicknames are easily recalled by multiple editors thus there wasn't a need to specify an episode/timestamp. Those nicknames were used continously in multiple episodes by multiple teams. KsprayDad 12:27, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
Andrian Lazarey
Please do not remove maintenance tags; they are there so that editors can provide the appropriate citations and references to the information on the article.
There's no indication of where the information is from. The actual television show? The official website? A fan website? An article in Entertainment Weekly or the New York Times? Please leave the tag there, so that the appropriate references can be added by editors. --Madchester 16:55, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
FTL (Alias)
I believe the Alias section would greatly benefit from an article on FTL, seeing as there is one for almost every major intelligence organization on the show. As I am not a member, I cannot do this myself, and last time I submitted an article to the article requests section, it was ignored. So, here is my article. Feel free to edit it as you will.
FTL is a fictional Chinese organized crime group on the TV series Alias that deals in intelligence. It is featured in the first season. It is based in Hong Kong and led by Quan Li. Another known operative is the torturer Dr. Jong Lee, aka "Suit and Glasses." FTL is a rival of the Alliance of Twelve (mainly SD-6), K-Directorate, and the CIA. At the beginning of the series, FTL appears to be ahead of the other groups in the hunt for artifacts of Milo Rambaldi, as many artifacts are retrieved from FTL bases. In the pilot, we learn that FTL was responsible for the death of Oskar Mueller, a modern-day alchemist (who based his work off of Rambaldi's designs) who is later revealed to have once headed the Prophet Five project. Later in the season, FTL headquarters is raided by agents of "The Man" led by Julian Sark. Quan Li is assassinated by Sark in public. After that, its agent roster was compromised, and presumably most of its agents were either killed or forced to work for the Man.
Alias | |
---|---|
Characters | |
Seasons | |
Related |
The Janice Dickinson Modeling Agency
I added those comments you made about Claudia to the article, which could give us an indication of what could happen during the series' run, which means we could see more models with related LGBT ties or other personal issues. Robert Moore 18:36 (UTC) 26 June 2006
Production Staff
What production staff are you talking about that have appeared in 2 out of 3 hours of Treasure Hunters?TeckWizContribsGuestbook 18:25, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
- The medical guy in episode 2 and the rescue divers and other production people who were hovering around the Browns in Hawaii.Otto4711 19:42, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
- And this amounts to two whole hours how?TeckWizContribsGuestbook 19:43, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
- There have been three hours of programming. Production staff appeared in hour one of programming and hour three of programming. I didn't say they appeared in "two whole hours" of the show. That doesn't even make sense.
- Production staff are also in TAR a lot. There are production people at a zipline which I think was in season 7. Another instince was season 9 when Fran was having a hard time bungee jumping. Also, the most obvious is also season seven when Brian and Greg flip their van and the camera guy is lying on the ground.TeckWizContribsGuestbook 20:14, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
- I didn't say that TAR staff are never seen on-camera. I said that the producers take pains not to break the 4th wall. See the trivia section for The Amazing Race where it talks about how TAR goes as far as digitally removing members of the crew in post-production.
- Production staff are also in TAR a lot. There are production people at a zipline which I think was in season 7. Another instince was season 9 when Fran was having a hard time bungee jumping. Also, the most obvious is also season seven when Brian and Greg flip their van and the camera guy is lying on the ground.TeckWizContribsGuestbook 20:14, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
- There have been three hours of programming. Production staff appeared in hour one of programming and hour three of programming. I didn't say they appeared in "two whole hours" of the show. That doesn't even make sense.
- And this amounts to two whole hours how?TeckWizContribsGuestbook 19:43, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
Honestly, I don't really care all that strongly about that particular item. I do think it's a somewhat significant difference between the two shows and it's worth including, and obviously I would prefer that it stay, but if it truly, truly bugs you so much to have it in the article then I'm not going to fuss if it gets deleted.Otto4711 20:25, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
I would like to put back the comments about good vs. evil... They are NPOV--the point is that some viewers thought her good and others thought her evil, and the final episode resolves it (not a POV, but fact). I worry your deletion of that stemmed from some possessiveness. Please respond on my talk page--Denn333 09:00, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
Reversion of special characters
Why when I edit articles do special characters (arrows, accented characters) sometimes suddenly spontaneously turn into question marks? See for example Treasure Hunters (TV series) in which a minor edit by me nowhere near any of them caused every arrow and accented character on the page to mutate. Otto4711 21:24, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
- It's most likely the browser you're using, or the character encoding that your browser is using at the moment. Have you tried changing the encoding to Unicode UTF-8? --JD 21:45, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
What's up with this redirect -or- Here I thought I was being so clever
So I thought I would cleverly use an existing page to start a new article since the existing page was no longer necessary but instead I somehow both created the article and turned the existing page into a redirect which I can't get pointed to the right place. The Virgin Queen (television) should either be deleted or redirected to The Virgin Queen (TV show) but I can't make it happen. What am I doing wrong? Otto4711 12:57, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
- The Virgin Queen (television) does redirect to The Virgin Queen (TV show). Repost a {{helpme}} if you can clarify your problem.--Commander Keane 13:01, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
- Weird. It was pointing to the film page last night and today on two different browsers on two different computers. Oh well, thanks anyway. Otto4711 13:06, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
CFD
Please don't remove the cfd tags from categories that were listed for deletion, renaming, etc. An admin will take care of that when the discussion is closed. Thanks! --Kbdank71 13:26, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
The Poker Movie
Believe it or not, I'm doing you a favor on tagging that article. The article as-is can easily be nominated for deletion and deleted because it doesn't even prove its existance, let alone its notability. (IMDB is a user-genertated database, they do as much fact-checking as Misplaced Pages does and not considered a reliable source, and the official site's server is offline.) If you want to keep the article, I suggest you update and assert some notability on that article, otherwise someone less lenient than I will put it through the deletion process. You may wish to consult WP:FILM, it's not an active guideline but more likely than not that other editors reviewing deletion nominations will follow it. hateless 22:11, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
- You tagged the article eleven minutes after it was created. Did you perhaps stop to think that it might be a work in progress? Otto4711 23:07, 19 August 2006 (UTC) (from User talk:Hateless
- To be blunt, I don't think the subject deserves an article on WP. I looked for what I can find on Google on the film and found nothing except for a bit on the website of the production house behind it. No independent verification, no news, nothing. Not even your website for the film works. It seems to me there's nothing you can do to improve the page because there is nothing to write about. Plus, your stand-off behavior is not helping matters, please see WP:CIVIL. Frankly, the film seems dead in the water as far as I know and such films are deleted regularly from WP. If there's something you know that I don't you should put it on the page. It takes at least 5 days to delete a page from WP, you have plenty of time to improve the article. hateless 23:35, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
- Amazingly enough, there are sources other than google. Why don't you try being a little patient? You'll live longer. Otto4711 23:42, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
- You know what else makes you live longer? Taking good advice to heart. hateless 23:46, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
- Amazingly enough, there are sources other than google. Why don't you try being a little patient? You'll live longer. Otto4711 23:42, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
- To be blunt, I don't think the subject deserves an article on WP. I looked for what I can find on Google on the film and found nothing except for a bit on the website of the production house behind it. No independent verification, no news, nothing. Not even your website for the film works. It seems to me there's nothing you can do to improve the page because there is nothing to write about. Plus, your stand-off behavior is not helping matters, please see WP:CIVIL. Frankly, the film seems dead in the water as far as I know and such films are deleted regularly from WP. If there's something you know that I don't you should put it on the page. It takes at least 5 days to delete a page from WP, you have plenty of time to improve the article. hateless 23:35, 19 August 2006 (UTC)