This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Mr. Magoo and McBarker (talk | contribs) at 20:53, 27 February 2016 (→Khojaly massacre memorials). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 20:53, 27 February 2016 by Mr. Magoo and McBarker (talk | contribs) (→Khojaly massacre memorials)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Khojaly massacre memorials
- Khojaly massacre memorials (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article is heavily based on partisan Azerbaidjani sources (violating WP:NPOV) and dead links – content not verifiable. No Misplaced Pages quality standard. No improvement of the article since 2014. Notability contested WP:N Markus2685 (talk) 13:17, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Notable and sourced... I now realized the lister is tagging everything related to Khojaly massacre with an AfD. --Mr. Magoo (talk) 19:14, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete: You obviously totally ignored my text for why this article should be deleted. The article is sourced – yes. But not in accordance with Misplaced Pages guidlines. The sources are partisan non-reliable Azerbaidjani sources and not verifiable dead links. I am not tagging everything related to Khojaly massacre, only partisan, badly sourced articles which are not fulfilling Misplaced Pages:Notability guidlines. Markus2685 (talk) 19:29, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
- The nominator is automatically counted to have voted delete, so no need to do it again. If there are dead links, tag them and try to find web archivals. I also don't understand how a source about a memorial existing could be partisan. --Mr. Magoo (talk) 19:40, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
- The article has severe issues and is marked as such since 2014. There has not been any changes and improvements to the article since then. Besides, it is the job of the creator of an article to source the content correctly with reliable and verifiable sources. But still there is the main issue of Notability. I don't see why we need an article on a encyclopedia about a list of commemorating memorials. Markus2685 (talk) 20:04, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
- Those 2014 tags were about neutrality. Again, I don't understand what the existence of memorials has to do with anything like that. When it comes to memorials, listing them separately is fairly common, like List of Armenian Genocide memorials. --Mr. Magoo (talk) 20:26, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
- With all respect and don't get me wrong, but you can not compare the importance and notabilty of a memorial list (not article, like in this case) for the Armenian Genocide, or the List of Holocaust memorials and museums – both the most scientifically and historically studied Genocides worldwide with millions of deaths – with this rather "small" event, which is composed of an article, and not a list. Markus2685 (talk) 20:42, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
- The point was that the concept of the lists is the same. The reason for keeping is that there exist numerous sources... --Mr. Magoo (talk) 20:52, 27 February 2016 (UTC)